The Journaling of Hinton 389

What Is an Article Critique? An article critique bases the strengths and weaknesses of an article on how well its author interprets its sources. This critique shows the validity and effectivity of the argument presented in the article. Critical thinking for this assignment is a must. Authors with a bias work hard to convince readers that their skewed position is correct. That is why the only tools for finding the truth is to be a good investigator, having the right tools to pick out facts from fiction. The structure in an article critique, addressed below, has different parts than a standard 5-paragraph essay. But, they are both ways to convince the reader that a point of view is true. A good article critique details what makes an article correct or incorrect, much like any persuasive essay. Read the article once to understand the information it presents. Why is this author considered an expert? What do other experts say about this author? Is he or she covered in academic praise? Data was generated by https://essayfreelancewriters.com!

Or is this person a lone wolf laughed at by professionals? What is this author’s thesis? Does the author have a clear message to deliver? Or do they use a lot of big words to hide that they have no actual position? Who is the target audience? Is the message geared towards everyone? Or does it use specialized slang that only an in-group would understand? Does the author present valid proof for their claims? Are the sources from all over the place? Does the author use sources from places that seem to share a cult-like vocabulary? What are the logical fallacies of the author’s point of view? Does homepage have logical blindspots? How much do those blindspots skew their outcome? Is there a clear conclusion? Much like your need to search for a thesis, you need to see if the author arrived at an obvious outcome. Found yourself in a situation where you type “write my essay“?

This isn’t an easy task if you have never studied formal logic. Undereducated people have common and hazardous logical fallacies. An example of bad logic is to accept information based on how good it makes you feel, instead of the proof that supports it. Ad hominem - when you attack the person saying something in order to discredit what they are saying. Slippery Slope - when you say that action A will always become the worst possible scenario. Correlation vs. Causation - when you say that because actions 1 and 2 happened one after the other, action 2 happened because of action 1, without looking deeper to see if it actually did. Wishful Thinking - when you believe something that doesn’t have any proof to back it up. You think it’s true because it makes you feel good. People pick sides of an argument based on what an outcome implies. For instance, if a conclusion makes someone feel bad about where they are in society, they can fight the evidence to make themselves feel better.

Look for any misplaced emotions in the tone of the text. 3) Note how the author interprets the texts of others. Does the author look at other people’s texts through inappropriately political lenses? It takes years of research to fully recognize the fingerprints and dog whistles of all the political slants that are out there. We can take the subject of animal studies. Let’s start with the fact that many people enter industries because of an emotional involvement of some sort to the topic. People who extensively write about animals are very likely those who genuinely love them. This can put their work at risk of being biased towards portraying animals in a way that gives the topic more importance than it deserves. This is what you have to look for. Find and highlight instances where the author overstates the importance of some things. To polish your mental research instruments, go back to point 1 of this list to review the list of logical fallacies. 4) See if the author cited untrustworthy sources. Identifying untrustworthy sources takes experience. Take Breitbart news for instance.