The Journaling of Hinton 389

Americans' Freedom To Choose : How Free? Americans are sacrificing essential values in the war against terror, and scrutinizes other critical issues such as the political process, criminal justice system, racial inequality and immigration. Today’s American: How Free? Freedom House, best known for its annual survey of the state of freedom around the world, has produced a book-length report on an individual country. “But how good is America at living up to its own ideals? A new study by Freedom House tries to answer this question. The fact that Freedom House has devoted so much attention to the United States is significant in its own right. Founded in 1941 by a group of Americans who were worried about the advance of fascism, Freedom House is now the world's leading watchdog of liberty. The fact that “Today's American: How Free? “For America to advance democracy abroad, we need to acknowledge our shortcomings, as well as tout our achievements. In Today’s American: How Free? Freedom House provides a forthright and illuminating look at our present condition. “This is an honest, balanced analysis of American democracy. Its comprehensive nature, global comparisons, and historical context make Today’s American: How Free? “Today's America: How Free? American democratic practice as well as the enduring strengths of its political system. Freedom House has applied the same keen, independent, analytical eye to the United States as it has done to the entire world over the years. Land of the free?

Although the satisfaction of black protesters’ demands was followed by the long string of threats and violence, it was one of earliest major victories in the history of African American civil rights movement. Despite all the twists and turns on the way towards the free life, the African Americas gave this world many gifted musicians, writers, artists, scientists, sportsmen, politicians and other eminent personalities. Although this is an essay on African American history rather than African American culture essay, it’s impossible not to mention the unique cultural contribution made by the African American freedom fighters into the world’s heritage, such as, for example, Spiritual Music, or simply Spirituals - the Christian hymns created by black slaves in America. In conclusion I'd like to say that that the history of African American civil rights movement is a unique example of people preserving the hope, when all the hope seemed to be gone, people being brave enough to rebel, when the whole society was against them, people, who although being in minority, changed the whole world they lived in and made it a better place. If you like this African American essay, on our website you can find more essays on popular topics or order any custom writing you need. Our professional and experienced team will be glad to write creative and professional essay for you on any topic you require.

Google AdWords helps advertisers display their advertisements in the Google content network, through either a cost-per-click or cost-per-view scheme. This is a true advertising service with daily monitoring and budget control facilities. An advertiser can set up a series of ads associated with certain keywords and test its performance daily. It is interesting that Google uses a price bidding system. If you bid for a high ranking position on the top page and if your ad attracts more visitors than your competition next to you, Google will gradually decrease your ad cost. It is possible to have a very top position on the page and pay less per click than the rest below you. This encourages creativity and unique content which in turn will make your campaign more successful. Keywords Services, all the above services would not be very useful unless you have some means of selecting the right keyword and phrases that match what your potential prospectors are looking for. Remember, you respond to written requests. Google has an extensive support service that helps in the selection of the right key words as well as monitoring the number of links associated with your competition.

These powerful tools enable you to determine both the demand and the competition based on keywords alone. There have been other services such as Gmail, Google News, Orkut and more being added as time goes by. There are no limits on creativity in a free social environment such as the one created by Google. I am not trying to minimize the contributions of other browsers such as Yahoo and Explorer. This article is not really about Google as a browser. It is about the free international society Google has helped create through access to knowledge and economic development. The cost of running a website could be as low as $5.00 per month. Blogs are free and can be used instead. The cost of entering an international business is very low. There are thousands of individuals who make a living by selling books that are often not even their own. Rock bands can record and publish their music for free. I can go on and on. Iran's Recent Attempt To Censor The Internet of it has been made possible, to a certain extent, by Google through its affordable promotional capabilities. Most importantly, Google has managed to create this social environment because there was no government oversight or regulation. The only self policing policy deals with abuse of services such as spamming. When the Chinese government tried to interfere with its operations, Google decided to get out of China. Imagine a World Governance where all freedoms are assured: Freedom of Speech, Freedom of Association, Freedom of Commerce and Freedom of Exchange of Ideas and Opinions, (including political). Internet is just that, and Google is the facilitator and the Governance. Data was created by Essay Writersversion!

As mentioned earlier, the First Amendment is important to nonprofits because it empowers Americans to fill some of the void left by the restricted government. However, the Resources Committee of the U. S. House of Representatives recently decided to question and challenge POGO's workings. As a result, the committee subpoenaed POGO's office and staff home telephone records. Losing A Friend Over Stupidity argues that the individuals who lend their voice to POGO's cause do so with the expectation of anonymity. Furthermore, the ACLU argues that revealing the identity of those individuals "endangers the freedom of speech and association guaranteed" them under the First Amendment (ibid.). 2) The second example involves charities lobbying "with regard to the nomination of John Ashcroft as attorney general" (INDEPENDENT SECTOR 2001). In response to this debate, INDEPENDENT SECTOR, a nonprofit and nonpartisan organization, represented hundreds of American nonprofits in their letter written urging the IRS to cease its scrutiny of many of the organizations that took part in this lobbying. Although Section 4911 allows nonprofits to lobby, there are limitations. If lobbying, a nonprofit organization is usually only allowed to expend funds insofar as the amount does not exceed a certain percentage of their income or assets.

This list is by far from exhaustive and it is a list based on the British situation, but I am sure those of you in other Anglo-Saxon nations will be able relate to many of the New Righteousness' Commandments. And Freedom Of Religion Essay Topics spake all these words, saying, we are the New Righteousness which hath brought thee out of the land of freedom under your constitutional Monarchy or American Republic and into the slave camp of political correctness. 1) I am the New Righteousness and thou shalt serve no other Righteousnesses before me nor question any directives that may emanate from the new world order EU Heaven in Brussels and Rome. 2) Thou shalt blaspheme The Lord Jesus Christ's name at every opportunity, especially on television and in films. 3) Thou shalt hold Her Majesty The Queen (God's anointed) in utter contempt. For American readers please read The Republic of the USA. 4) Thou shalt conform and thou shalt not think for thyself, neither shalt thou exercise any form of freedom of speech even in the 'privacy' of your own home. Post was generated by https://essayfreelancewriters.com.

In such Importance Of Civil Rights will be called to arrest you. 5) Thou shalt not utter any word that the New Righteousness may deem offensive to any of those of an alien origin or of an alternative sexual life style. 6) Thou shalt be branded a phobic if thou disagreeth or holdeth an opinion that be in opposition to, or blaspheme against, the directives of the New Righteousness. 7) Thou shalt attack the sacred institution of marriage at every turn. Thou shalt emasculate, insult, ridicule and mock heterosexual men when and wherever possible, especially in TV dramas, films and advertisements. 9) Thou shalt not complain when those of alien origin or those of the New Righteousness remind you repeatedly of your 'wicked' imperial past. 10) Thou shalt follow the directive of open season hostilities towards Christians and Christianity, but woe be unto thee if thou shalt pick on or question other religions or cultures or deem them as any way other than superior to you and your own.

11) Thou shalt not make reference to any form of racial or cultural difference even if apparent for all to see, as this will be deemed cloaked racism by the New Righteousness. 12) Thou shalt drive thy motor vehicle keeping to restrictions designed for brakeless vehicles of the 1930's. Neither shalt Freedom In 17th Century America Free Essays - PhDessay.com drive using the freedom of personal judgement as this will bring forth punishment as fit for a deadly sin. 13) Thou shalt understand that those guilty of motoring offences are evil criminals and will be jailed when and wherever possible even though prisons are bursting to over flowing and violent thugs are set free to repeat offend. 14) Thou shalt not measure any distance in miles, yards, feet and inches nor weigh any goods in hundred-weights, stones, pounds and ounces as this will be deemed a national identifying sign to be shunned, by order of the New Righteousness, and punishable by public stoning.

This was created with the help of Essay Freelance Writers.

15) Thou shalt not fly the national flag as this is deemed offensive by the New Righteousness and to a lesser degree those of an alien origin. 16) Thou shalt be prepared to lose the names of thy country England and counties and happily receive the characterless EU names: southern, northern, eastern or western region in their stead. 17) Thou shalt receive without question the unproven doctrine of man made global warming and anyone providing viable exhaustive scientific evidence to the contrary will be charged with treason. 18) Thou shalt also welcome and receive all directives by the Health and Safety executive especially those that render machines and equipment so safe they cannot be used. 19) Thou shalt not exercise any form of nous or common sense. Anyone found guilty of such will be sent to a New Righteousness concentration camp for conditioning. 20) Thou shalt not drive any form of motorised vehicle 'unnecessarily', but suffer wholly the purifying experiences of the sack cloth and ashes of public transport or road tax free, cycling.

21) Thou shalt be prepared to carry the derogatory label "Little Englander" if thou displayeth any form of patriotism. 22) Thou shalt smoke cannabis and addle thy brain and drive thy car whilst under its influence, but thou shalt not smoke plain cigarettes or plain tobacco. 23) Honour thy Establishment puppets in Westminster and Downing Street that thy days may be long in the land, even though they are as corrupt as the Devil, and they give you no political choice, they live the life of old Riley, they knock off at 5:30 and just rubber stamp new directives from EU Heaven. 24) Thou shalt be guilty until proven innocent, and thou shalt be prepared to accept it unlikely, that thou shalt be found innocent, as all judges will swear allegiance to the New Righteousness. 25) Thou shalt live thy life in permanent gratitude and thankfulness to the New Righteousness which will provide all thy daily needs, but thou shalt not aspire to want more and to know better than the New Righteousness.

Freedom is a constant theme throughout American history. The country was founded on this theme and continues to define the ideas of freedom today. The American government is based off this theme. It was a debate and issue of conflict among the settlers, Colonies, slaves, and within the Union. However, many early Americans did not share the same vision of freedom. Feminist Tyranny - A U.S. Export To The World had a different vision of freedom that was literal. They sought relief from the life of bondage. The Europeans that settled and colonized in America defined freedom much differently. Their concept of freedom included religious freedom, economic freedom, and independence. Although their ideas differ, early Americans defined the new world constructed on their concept of freedom. When Columbus began his journey, he wanted to explore the world to bring Christianity to foreign lands and cultures. This can be observed in his biography when describing his challenge to find a financial investor.

However, this can also be observed in the writings of his diary when he landed on the shores of the Caribbean and thought he found India. When he meets the indigenous people of the island he calls them, “good servants and ready Christians”, (Columbus 1492). Columbus wanted to introduce Christianity to a free world. Although he did not land in America, his journey made a significant impact on what would become known as the United States of America. Columbus “discovery” helped to find a new nation based on freedom and liberty. Many early settlers joined the Colonies to avoid religious persecution. This can be observed in the Puritans of New England. Puritans were former members of the Anglican Church of England. However, when groups wanted to separate from the Church, the English sought to imprison them. As a result, many joined the Colonies. Other separate groups include the Quakers. The Puritans were the first religious sect to join the colonies besides Anglicans. They came to the Colonies to avoid religious persecution therefore their vision of freedom was based on religious freedom.

This post has been written with Essay Freelance Writersversion.

The Puritans and others sought freedom to practice their religion. This can be observed in the ordinances of the Mayflower Compact of 1620. “Having undertaken, for the glory of God and advancement of the Christian faith and honour of our King and Country, a voyage to plant the first Colony in the northern parts of Virginia”, (Mayflower Compact, 1620). As a result, many earlier settles found themselves in the New World for the freedom of religion. A century later, the concept of freedom changed for some Americans. Their concept of freedom was based off ideas of independence. During the 1700’s there were tensions Colonialist and King Georgia III. The British monarchy was in debt from war and trade and began to tax the Colonist. While How Free Is The Christian's Freedom Of Speech? thought the tax unfair, others pushed for democracy by representation in the English Parliament. These disagreements changed the concept of freedom for Colonist. They associated the New World with independence and freedom.

Many left England for America to remove themselves from the rule of the English government. Colonists were independent. They developed trade, commerce, and a new society. They followed the rules of law established within their Colony and not the English government. This relationship between freedom and independence can be observed in the events of the Boston Tea Party and in the words of Thomas Paine. Thomas Paine authored the political pamphlet “Common Sense”. The article was popular throughout the Colonies and in England that expressed the concepts of freedom and independence. Paine declares himself independent from English rule promoting sovereignty and a balanced government. Before the turn of the 19th century, America exercised their freedom and officially established the United States. The relationship between independence and freedom can be observed in government documents including the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence. The Constitution states government is to “secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Prosperity”, (US Constitution, 1788). Money Crisis And Low Self Esteem express government concerns with individual freedom and the liberty to self-govern. The Declaration of Independence states that Americans have “unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness”.

I just lost a friend because he disagreed with my point of view on these five high school students who were booted from school for wearing American flags on "Cinco de Mayo." And it's not that I disagreed with him, really. I said that I thought it was a mistake for the school to boot these five numbskulls for acting like little racist, teabagging idiots. If they want to wear the American flag on a t-shirt (although a TRUE patriot KNOWS that wearing the flag as an article of clothing is inappropriate), unless these little teabaggers were in violation of a school rule, then they should have been left alone. Of course, the right wing idiot-o-sphere is going nuts over the fact that these good, clean, AMERICAN kids were booted from school while those dirty, filthy, brown-skinned MEXICANS were allowed to STAY and FLAUNT their heritage on a day that is barely even observed in Mexico but is more-or-less used an another excuse to get drunk on an ethnic holiday in America. I mean, how many teabagger kids make a special point of wearing an American flag to flip the metaphorical "finger" to the Irish on St. Patrick's Day?

So, OF COURSE these kids were making a political statement. And OF COURSE the right wing nut-o-sphere is going batshit over this. I just never realized my friend was so far gone with his right wing craziness that he would let my opinion cost him my friendship. This was not a casual Facebook friend. I served with in Japan. A former room mate. Someone who, for some reason, decided to stay in Japan when his tour ended. One of the best pals I have ever had. And now, because Improving Your Life And Career With True Freedom misunderstands my point here as saying it's ever wrong for kids to wear the American flag on any day they want to (which proper flag etiquette says IS wrong), he has disavowed my friendship and cut me off from any further communication. Of course, I've known my friend to be a right wing ideologue since I met him. He was absolutely certain that Bill Clinton was an agent of the Chinese government and that Hillary was a murderer. We was CERTAIN that instead of turning over power in 2001, Clinton would declare martial law and hold on to the presidency. Now, he is CERTAIN that Obama is a Kenyan Manchurian Muslim Candidate who has nothing less than the destruction of FREEDOM on his agenda, and that means we'll all be rounded up and put in the camps. My friend would make these statements on FB posts, and I would chide him in good nature. But I also remember the friend who I drank sake with at the Yokohama baseball park, who I strolled the streets of Tokyo with. I thought our friendship went beyond ideology.

The charm of interactivity with others wears off quickly and has limitations. While not everyone may be suited for the island of personal exile. Paradise comes in myriad formats of personal perception. Sometimes, solitary personal placements have their encouragements. Yet, autonomy has a lack of sovereignty in a perfect sense. Freedom is misleading. Absolute freedom is an ideal conception. It is not just a matter of being free, but a deliberation upon the consequences of its cause and effect upon all the senses. Free will invites the liberty of divergent conflicts no matter what the fear of others. Blameworthiness collides with one's striving to move onward, along with accountability and responsibility. Openness to exceptional possibilities encourages the nonconformity of personal conviction to escape the entrapment of others. However, when remorse, fear, and guilt are allowed to shame individual self-directed action, unproductive dysfunctional conformity sets in. This geometric progression of human devolution hastens the eventual demise of the species. As personal responsibility falters, chaos and anarchy join forces.

This article was created by Essay Writers!

Accountability ends up with accumulated losses to the detriment of civilization. Even though the opposition and the challenge to social conforming has its risks, only a few brave ones will accept the challenge. In opposition, the vast majority will insist upon the cowardice of their gluttonous collectivism. The many will accept the contrived perpetration of those that demand mindless conventionality. For the warrior mindset, willful rebellion to oppressive tyrannies do go unchallenged. The blessed sanctification of solitude, in the potency of ultra-rationalization, with wise control of bias, is the antidote for the wild spread of arrogance in the cultivation of stupidity. Being alone, meditating rigorously in the sweat of intense ideation, the laborious quest for wiser ascendency never ceases to hunt for the liberation in transformation. Fighting back, resisting and arguing ethical precepts in wisdom versus ignorance, to ensure a righteous sense antagonism. Purposeful in the drive to strive to achieve the fruition of dreams, aspirations and wishes stir the imagination and potency of creativity. I Refuse To Be Politically Correct is essential. Regardless of the opposing forces that are ever-present, with their negativity, both overt and covert, the individual perseveres onward against the onset of the zombie apocalypse.

That of course is a metaphorical reference to the degrading erosion of culture toward eventual extinction of the human species. Relentless, and sometime ruthless, the warrior mindset defends the rightness of individuation in personal liberation. Are You Looking For Hindi Newspapers Website For Hindi News? of the will fosters release from social bondage. To erect obstacles and throw up barriers at every turn, the less evolved, the inept, and the detractors will find opportunities for their schemes. Cowardice grimaces upon the faces of the fearful, who know only weakness and forsake acts of courage. Ethical weakness abounds everywhere. For the negative people, instead of being crafters, artisans, or warriors, they will perform their role as betrayers and steal from others. No matter what the risk, however, the energies of warriors configure different alternatives that are productive. The pleasure of gainful enrichment for being free stimulates the expectations of perseverance. Yet, free at no cost is unrealistic. Everything has a price and always carry risks. Likewise, as faith in the invisible bears no allegiance to the tangible, the ethical admonition is to the betterment of oneself with no harm to others.

The Bitch: England, My England! of Freedom Many Americans think of freedom as an idea and practice that was pioneered in the United States of America. Mark Twain’s The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn is based on the truly American concept of individual freedom. This tale is about a young boy named Huckleberry Finn who travels down the Mississippi River with a runaway slave named Jim. The most literal form of freedom comes through Jim, who is escaping human bondage. Freedom comes in different forms in the book as well, particularly through the protagonist, Huck Finn. Mark Twain’s novel, The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn provides a statement on individual freedom and magnifies the conflict between man -or in this case, boy- against society. While writing The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn, Twain was not very concerned with the issue of slavery and freedom for blacks, but the subject is touched on throughout the story through Jim’s character. Jim’s idea of freedom is simply owning oneself and having his wife, children and friends free from human bondage as well. Jim’s freedom, however, is not at all what the novel is about. For help with essay, please contact https://essayfreelancewriters.comversion.

On the Mexican side of the border the tunnel entrance went down more than 80 feet to a wood lined floor and on the U.S. Other news reports on drug cartels and Mexico in 2010 included a raid in South America where a totally submersible submarine, to be used for drug smuggling, was found under construction in the jungle, the murder of a U.S. Mexican and U.S. borders, and the recommendation by the Mexican government that Mexican citizens returning to Mexico for the holidays travel in convoys and only in daylight for their own safety from bandits and drug cartels. Whatever the political class and the government is doing is not working but still costing us untold billions and billions of dollars a year. The demand for illegal drugs has not abated significantly while the obscene profits made by filling that demand has resulted in a more and more violent criminal element of suppliers. Content has been generated by https://essayfreelancewriters.com!

With the death of a Border agent 13 miles from the border we are seeing the first migration of the Mexican lawlessness and violence deeper and deeper into our country. And those bringing the violence are not ordinary street thugs. If they are capable of digging sophisticated smuggling tunnels and fully functional submarines, we are facing a well financed, well organized, and focused criminal force, a force that more or less can bribe, threaten, or kill any Mexican official that disrupts their operations. Compare their capabilities with the American political class, a group of politicians that list the passage of a law that regulates the sound volume of television commercials as a major 2009 accomplishment. If we allow our political class and their approach to problem solving to confront this threat, who do you think wins? It gets back to what New York Times writer David Brooks calls "immobile government." It is highly unlikely, after more than four decades, that the current group of politicians in this country are nimble enough, or smart enough, to successfully repel the likely migration of drug cartel violence into this country. This content was done with the help of Essay Writers!

The drug cartels are focused, well organized and nimble, three descriptions I would never apply to our political class. What should we do in the face of this immobility? One apporach would impanel a special commission of smart Americans, sans politicians and lobbyists, to do a ground up look of the entire drug market, legal and illegal. Advantages And Disadvantages Of Reconstruction For African Americans would draw on the expertise of economists, sociologists, medical experts, substance abuse experts, drug enforcement experts, legal experts, etc. and also on the experiences of other nations which have had varying degrees of success by changing their approach to the whole drug addiction social issue. The panel's work would result in a small set of alternatives to the whole issue, alternatives that would be voted on by the American public, bypassing the immobile Congress and political class altogether. The most popular alternative, as determined by the voters who would have considered the pros and cons of each option, as laid out by the panel, would be implemented nationwide. This would simultaneously return the power of democracy to the people while finally improving the nation's plight of violent and intrusive drug cartels. The state government of California now spends a bigger portion of its budget on its prison systems than it does on its school systems. By changing our approach to the war on drugs, maybe, just maybe, we can end this type of insanity from our political class. However, Concepts Of Freedom In Colonial America ends only if we find a way to bypass their immobility.

Over the past month, Iran's civil unrest in Tehran and other cities drew the spotlight closer as the world watched another example of the power of the Internet. From West And Its Influence On The Rest of public demonstrations in response to the recent re-election of President Ahmadinejad, the government of Iran attempted to censor media coverage, going to the extremes to include ordering the news media to stay in their hotel rooms and censorship of the Internet. Hundreds of thousands of people took to the streets in Iran in protest. The only coverage of this historical event was what the citizens of Iran could disseminate via the Internet. Although the government of Iran has bragged about their Internet filtering capabilities, their attempts were of little consequence as the world watched events unfold on websites such as Twitter, Facebook and You Tube. Hundreds of videos and pictures were uploaded on websites. Major news organizations were basing their stories on still images and text messages they received off the Internet, from those participating in the uprising.

The world was at awe at not only the chutzpah of the citizens of Iran, but how much of a pivotal role the Internet played in getting the word out, despite the Iranian government's attempt to censor the media. Internet filtering is nothing new. Like checkpoints at border crossings, countries can place 'checkpoints' or filters on servers (that they control), that handle inbound and outbound traffic to their country. These filters look for keywords, that if detected can be logged and/or prevent that traffic from continuing its journey to the recipient. The origination of that keyword can then be traced back to the computer that was used to type in that keyword. Certain countries, like Iran and China, use this capability to identify and punish those individuals who they deem a threat to society. In essence, censorship with a cost. That is one of the reasons that anonymous surfing through the use of proxy servers is critical to the efforts of those fighting censorship oppression. An effective anonymous surfing application will encrypt your Internet traffic, so the Internet filters cannot identify keywords, as well as redirect you to a proxy server, which masks your IP Address - in essence, protecting your identity. There are numerous anonymous browsing applications available today. But, the majority of them use slow proxy servers, and some do not even encrypt your connection. Covert Surfer is popular among bloggers and others in support of freedom of speech and the fight against censorship. Covert Surfer uses high speed servers as well as 256 AES bit encryption to secure your Internet connection and bypass those Internet filters. During the Iranian crisis, Covert Surfer offered their anonymous surfing application for free to those trying to get the word out.

Moreover, as Stone also suggests, protesting students are well within their rights even to demand that the institution take disciplinary action against other students, faculty or administrators who engage in odious behavior. The real question is whether and how to act on such demands. As Bruce Shapiro, executive director of the Dart Center for Journalism and Trauma, has written, “Leadership matters -- not just on the substance of legislation, hiring or executive orders, but leadership in the face of emotionally evocative symbolic and narrative disputes.” Let’s take the incident at Yale that has aroused so much heat, in which a faculty residence adviser sent an email to a restricted list of students criticizing a message sent earlier by minority affairs counselors advising against offensive Halloween costumes. The adviser’s email spurred an angry response from minority students, some of whom demanded the adviser’s dismissal. This, I would argue, was well within those students’ rights. But were the Yale administration to accede to such a demand, it would be a different matter.

Data has been generated with the help of Essay Writers!

Indeed, as I’ve written elsewhere, the issue at Yale, Missouri and other institutions is largely not one of free expression but of communication, environment and values. Shapiro puts it well: “At a time of unprecedented economic inequality, students of color, immigrants and students from low-income backgrounds -- at rich, elite universities and state schools alike -- are painfully aware that the experiences they bring to campus are ill appreciated by many classmates, teachers and administrators, who come overwhelmingly from a culture of middle-class safety nets and an economy that rewards those who already have. Here it's necessary to credit the students for their courage and determination in addressing the sometimes unconscious but nonetheless real and persistent racism that infects our society and our campuses. In doing so, they have made and will again make mistakes. They will offend others even as they respond to deeper offenses against their own dignity. They may demonstrate indifference to the rights of others, as protesters everywhere always have. But, in doing so, they will learn. And that, it seems to me, is the essential point. Student academic freedom, in the final analysis, is about the freedom to learn. And learning is impossible without error. What is therefore most remarkable about today’s student movements is not their alleged intolerance or immaturity. It is not their intemperance or supposed oversensitivity to insult and indifference. It is that they have begun to grapple with issues that their elders have resisted tackling for far too long. But the university, and especially its faculty, must also be willing to learn from students. Faculty members should welcome the challenges the protesting students have posed. Student movements offer countless opportunities for students -- as well as their teachers -- to learn. To approach Iran, Israel & The 12th Imam - Free Article Courtesy Of ArticleCity.com in this way, in the spirit of the student academic freedom proclaimed and defined by the AAUP and its collaborators back in 1967, is therefore simply to fulfill our responsibility as educators.

One of the major problems facing this country is the lost war on drugs. Initiated over forty years ago, all levels of U.S. A recent Huffington Post article reported on the murder of a Mexican mother who had been protesting in front of a Mexican governor's office to demand justice for her recently murdered daughter. Three judges have been suspended for releasing the main suspect in her daughter's murder, who apparently turned right around and killed the protesting mother, a murder that was caught on a security videotape. Rhetorical Devices In The Inaugural Address Of John F. Kennedy took place in Ciudad Juarez where over 3,000 people have been killed by drug gang battles in 2010. This is more than the 2,600 people that were killed there in 2009. Of the 2,600 murders in 2009, there were 93 homicide cases opened and only 19 convictions. This computes out to a opened case ratio of 3.6% and a meager conviction rate of .73%.

Jessie Redmon Fauset (1882-1961) also viewed art as a means for political or propagandist ends. In her personal life, as in her art, Fauset strove to depict the middle class values of which she saw as the way to freedom and equality for her race. In one very revealing episode in which her personal inclination conflicted with social propriety, Fauset chose to stay within the boundaries of society set for her. On a trip to Africa, Fauset had visited alone the section of Algiers named the Kasbah. She returned the next day with two companions, only to be warned by a Frenchwoman that the "quarters are too dangerous to visit without an escort" (Wall 34). Notwithstanding the fact that she had been there alone already and now had two companions, Fauset adhered to the proper conduct the Frenchwoman informs her of.

Fauset had earned degrees from Cornell University and the University of Pennsylvania, and had worked as a high school teacher for fourteen years before becoming involved in the Renaissance (Wall 35). During the years she spent as literary editor of The Crisis, from 1919 to 1926, she was also the "most prominent black woman writer" (Wall 36). Fauset published "poems, reportage, reviews, short stories, and translations" in addition to her four novels (Wall 36). Being strictly conservative, Fauset "adapted the conventions of the sentimental novel to her own purposes," which were to "explore the impact of racism and sexism on black Americans' lives and represent the means by which black Americans overcame these oppressions and got on with the business of living" (Wall 66). However, the black Americans Fauset fictionalizes are middle-class, like herself, and firmly adhering to the values of the dominant society. The novels she wrote, There is Confusion (1924), Plum Bun (1929), The Chinaberry Tree (1931), and Comedy: American Style (1933), are social critiques of African American middle class life, and a condemnation of the racism and sexism that constrains African Americans.

Wall asserts the basic theme of Fausets novels is "propriety for the New Negro woman was virtually a racial obligation" (80). Fauset, in her art as well as her demeanor, attempts to dispel the stereotype of African American women as exotic, overtly sexual beings. In creating the image of the proper middle class African American woman, Fauset had to suppress her sexuality, and to conduct herself within the boundaries of social propriety. To Fauset, this was not a bad thing; she believed that her behavior, and the like behavior of other African Americans, would uplift her race from injustice and prejudice. In her preface to her third novel Plum Bun, Fauset describes her literary philosophy: I have depicted something of the home life of the colored American who is not being pressed too hard by the Furies of Prejudices, Ignorance, and Economic Injustice…. And behold he is not so vastly different from any other Americans. Sato 67) Her novels depict that, given the freedom to educate their minds without enduring prejudices or economic hindrances, all African Americans can achieve just as well as any other American. In other words, that African Americans do not possess any inborn, or inherent characteristics that distinguish them from whites; it is all a matter of social and economic boundaries that differentiates the African American race. Bibliography Sato, Hiroko. "Under the Harlem Shadow: A Study of Jessie Fauset and Nella Larsen." The Harlem Renaissance Remembered. Ed. Arna Bontemps. New York: Dodd, Mead & Company, 1972. 63-89. Wall, Cheryl A. Women of the Harlem Renaissance. Mary Arnold holds a B.A. Article has been created by https://essayfreelancewriters.com!

In this light, he indicated that continuing the war would show the world we have no honorable intentions in Vietnam, and our hope is to drag China into a war so we would be able to bomb its nuclear installations. With respect to continuing protest of the war, he requested the churches and synagogues to continue urging America to disengage from Vietnam and encouraged the ministers to seek conscious objector's status. He brought up that America is on the wrong side of the world's revolution, because we now consider property and material things more important than people; thus, we are approaching spiritual death. On the issue of the importance of people, he revealed that all over the world men are revolting against the old system of exploitation and oppression, and new systems of justice and equality are being born. As a result, we should desire love to be the ultimate force and saving grace of life and not death and evil. Additionally, he reinforced that powers without compassion; might without morality; and strength without sight, will drag America down the corridor of shame; therefore, we must rededicate ourselves to a beautiful world, which is the calling of the sons of God. Article was generated by Essay Writers!

Ever since the time of Abe Lincoln, Democrats and Republicans have been fighting for control of the United States Of America. In Supersized Government , both political parties contained liberals, moderates and conservatives. As time wore on the Democratic Party moved more to the left or 'liberal' and the Republican Party moved more to the right or 'Conservative'. This left room for fewer and fewer moderates. Over the last several years, however, the far, far left has been taking over control of the Democratic Party and now the coup is almost completed. The far left zealots have virtually pushed most of the slightly left, the moderates and the conservatives out of the Democratic Party. Most of the moderates and conservatives left have learned to keep quiet and go with the tide in order to stay in office. Now the battle, for control of this country, has changed, it is now the far left against everyone else.

This post was written with Essay Writers.

People like Howard Dean, Nancy Pelosi, Joseph Biden, Robert Byrd, Barbara Boxer, etc. (I don't include Edward Kennedy because, in my opinion, he lost touch with reality long ago and just talks in order to see and hear himself on the news.) along with their Hollywood friends, Barbara Streisand, Susan Saranden, Alec Baldwin, Whoopi Goldberg, Martin Sheen, Spike Lee, etc., now run the Democratic Party and more moderate people, like Joseph Lieberman, are being ignored or vilified by the party, the party's supporters and a large part of the press. The far left only wants people, that think like they do or will do what they tell them to do, in the Democratic Party. They fear and dislike moderates, conservatives, moderate liberals and anyone that they can not control. The far left has gone so far left that, in my opinion, they make liberals seem like hard right wingers. I don't believe that the far left cares about America, the American people or anyone else except themselves.

Off With Their (Political) Heads! Shouted The Queen Of Hearts want power and they will do anything to get and keep that power. They claim to support our troops in Afganistan and Iraq, yet they do everything they can do to ruin the troops moral and aid the terrorists. They use their Hollywood friends and the ultra liberal press to spread half truths, lies, rumors and ridiucule about anyone who does not agree with them. They have even taken to giving responses to President Bush's speeches before he makes the speech. They have learned from President Clinton how to take credit for anything good that happens and how to lay blame on others for anything bad that happens. They use people like President Carter, one of the kindest, most caring, most honest and most trusting men to ever hold public office, to critcize the present administration's policies. President Carter, does not have an agenda, he is just, as always, slightly naive about and too trusting of the good will of others.

He believes that there would be peace on earth if people followed the dictates of the far left, so the far left uses him as a front. The far left uses celebrities who are not only naive but insulated from the real world. Celebrities who are surrounded by yes people telling them that they are smarter and better than the rest of us, celebrities who are wealthy, do not have to go to a supermarket to do their shopping, who fly first class, drive whatever kind of car they wish, live in expensive homes or apartments and pay people to do most everything for them. These celebrities can afford to be idealistic and fight for ideals that can't work.

Interpretations of freedom of speech have varied throughout the course of history. Yet, the term is seen as a basic right in the United States because it is guaranteed in the First Amendment to the U. S. Constitution. The amendment states "Congress shall make no law… abridging the freedom of speech or of the press" (National Archives and Records Administration 2001). This means that U. S. citizens may write and speak without governmental restraint and that they have the right to seek out the writings and thoughts of anyone they choose to hear or read. In other words, the ideas expressed by Marx, Gandhi, the Koran, and Socrates all have the right to be read in the United States because "we, the citizen-voters, have authority, have legal power, to decide what we will read," and "what we will think about" (Meiklejohn 1965). Moreover, citizens can do so without U.S. Notably, the roots of freedom of speech are closely entangled with its suppression throughout history. During the Middle Ages, nation building and loyalty were political goals.

As a result, dissent was outlawed (Stevens 1982). The law of the land paralleled a literal interpretation of the Bible, making free speech and thought unacceptable. The Middle Ages promoted the belief that heretics and people possessing unique ideas were not "human being and certainly not entitled to any rights" (ibid.). During the seventeenth century one of the most well-known examples of the suffocation of expressive freedom occurred. The Church, in 1616, urged Galileo to stop promoting the idea that the sun was at the center of the universe. Many clerics were afraid of the unknown and by admitting "the possibility of a fundamental error" they feared instigating "other challenges of Church infallibility" (ibid.). As a result, a free thinker became a martyr to society. It was not until 18th century Colonial America that the freedom of speech was recognized as a shield against a despotic government. A colonial newspaper publisher, John Peter Zenger, used his journalistic power in 1734 to oppose the policies of New York Governor William Cosby (CNN Interactive 2001). Until that point in history, such dissent would have normally instigated harsh action toward Zenger.

But in 1735, Zenger was acquitted on the grounds that "truth is a defense against libel" (ibid.). This viewpoint seemingly moved to the forefront of many colonial intellectual minds, for the freedom of speech was later included in the American Constitution. The inclusion of the freedom of speech in the Bill of Rights, however, did not reflect a consensus opinion on the matter. The Sedition Act of 1789 certainly played a role in curbing the unhindered expression of American citizens. Limitations and interpretations of the freedom of speech have continued to evolve throughout the 20th century. The American Mercury journalist, H.L. Mencken, was imprisoned in 1926 following the argument by Boston censorship groups that his journalism was full of "scathing criticisms of American culture" and "was obscene" (ibid.). Furthermore, the Smith Act of 1940 declared that it was a crime to "advocate, abet, advise, or teach the duty… of overthrowing or destroying any government of the United States by force of violence" (ibid.). This data has been written with the help of Essay Writers.

The First Amendment and the freedom of speech are important to the nonprofit or third sector because they allow "groups to organize, operate, and speak freely, all within wide limits" (Clotfelter and Ehrlich 1999). In other words, the rights of nonprofit organizations protected by the freedom of speech provide a microphone through which they can speak on behalf of various issues and populations. There are instances, however, in which boundaries are placed on the freedom of speech rights of nonprofits. In 1991, the Supreme Court ruled that Congress held the power to insist that a nonprofit organization receiving federal funds must implement programs in exact accordance with the guidelines of the government funding agency. This was the outcome of the Rust v. Sullivan Case that also emphasized nonprofits, in these circumstances, are to keep their "First Amendment right to free speech and petition" separate and distinct "from the programs supported by federal funds" (ibid.). 1) The debate surrounding Project of Government Oversights (POGO), a nonprofit watchdog organization dedicated to "exposing waste, fraud and corruption" in areas of government.

What would our world be like if freedom and democracy were never an issue? Americans feel deeply blessed for living in America. Unlike many other countries around the world, America is a land of freedom and opportunity, a place where people come to be free and to live their dreams. Unfortunately, Americans must pay a big price for freedom, to other nations and to themselves. Out of all of the countries in the world, America is one of the only nations where every individual is free. Although their freedom is limited, they have the right to many things that other people do not. In America, women are treated as equally as men, as are other ethnic groups. So, although Americans are free, must they all pay a price? Unfortunately, all Americans are forced to pay a price, a price of the worst kind. Americans must pay the price of fear, fear to live in America when other nations envy and despise there country. In their jealousy and rage, they make threats on America, threats that are often never carried out, but unfortunately, some are.

On September 11 of 2001, America was attacked by terrorists of the worst kind, and they paid the ultimate price. Attacks such as this have happened before, and each time the terrorists are sure they have made America an unbearable place in which to live. Because America is free, everyone enjoys living in there, and will pull together in efforts to save it. But, Ameirca will stand together, and no matter what, there freedom will pull them together and will never fail. Along with other nations forcing Americans to pay for freedom, Americans themselves pay to be free. Americans pay taxes, in order for there governments to run smoothly, but Americans also work hard to keep freedom an option. American citizens must abide by strict laws and work hard to keep America a protected place. Americans pay for freedom in work, and every American works hard to make life in America a pleasurable one.

If there are processes & procedures that have to be performed throughout a business day, there should be a flexible contingency method that enables the staff member to help clear long queues then get back to their procedural matters or conclude them in a quiet period. Any branch of any business that takes the above stance will see their volume of customers increase. Ensure the option to talk to an actual person is on the 1st list of menu options offered. Teach your staff to actually listen to the problem. Teach your staff not to be menu-driven when giving support. Ensure the Reduction of waiting times is a constant priority. Design the menu options you offer from the customer's point of view. WHAT CAN CUSTOMERS DO? Vote with your feet! When making a telephone call, have a piece of paper and pen ready. Always seek the name & job title of the person you're speaking to and write it down. This post was created with Essay Writers.

Ask to speak to/see the manager or senior member to make a verbal complaint. If that fails, seek the name of their customer services manager - they have to give to you. Find out the email address of the person or department you need to speak to. Write to the relevant person. In these instances the pen is truly mightier than the sword. Send letters recorded delivery. Someone has to sign for it. Organisations still have to reply to a written letter by law. WHAT WOULD I LIKE TO SEE? Customers to respond to bad service with their feet. If it's a chain store, don't visit that branch; better still, the whole chain. If we can't be bothered to take action, they don't need to respond. A list of the good and bad accessible to all. Management of respective business presented with a daily/weekly/monthly list of complaints to resolve. Highlight bad/good Company of the week/month. Freedom of speech of bad company/branch through their respective local press.

The sleeping giant needs to awaken from this dream world it has let itself get into in the last 50 years and take action quickly to prevent this cancer from spreading to the next generation. America is number one because it has the hardest working people on the face of the earth. Being free and industrious has its advantages but its downfalls also. It seems increasingly difficult to have the cake and eat it to. America is number one because it is free and people have choices to make that they only can answer for themselves. Having freedom is the greatest gift a human being can have. America is strong because of freedom and it is this freedom to choose that will permit It to overcome this hurdle history has chosen to leave on Americas doorstep. America is number one because it has the resources, the determination and the leadership to overcome whatever the Universe throws at it. Trying to explain the unexplainable is a daunting task that history will record, for future generations. The quality of life in America is the best in the modern era. Our freedom of speech gives us responsibility to record and research, for all possible solutions that can help the whole world. Speak out and help your neighbor. Create a positive attitude movement, that will sweep the nation and help bring the solutions that will help America tame this angry epidemic, before it takes hold of the nation. America is number one because it can take it. Now lets solve it. There are many tools that exist to help us understand why and we need to study them carefully and use the knowledge to help others.