The Journaling of Hinton 389

If it weren't for the Internet, none of this information would be public today. Neither you nor I would be sharing this information right now. But as a professor, researcher and educator, I will always believe that it is imperative that all people know both sides of any issue. Truth is freedom. To manipulate Freedom of Religion is a crime. Make sure your political leaders are not willing to 'make a deal' with the larger corporations who profit at the expense of the masses. And also make sure the truth behind aspartame, and any issue, is allowed to be spoken publicly. In America, the wealthy manufacturers pay-off or threaten those who choose to air this information publicly. I have much proof on this. Q: If there is any other information you wish to add, feel free to include it in the reply for the interview. We might have overlooked some important points. A: Please go back and reread Sweet Poison, as so much is said within those pages.

This issue is real, and not meant to harm anyone (but the pocketbooks of those who gain millions). This information is meant to teach individuals of all cultures the hidden facts and dangers of a manipulated and very toxic food chemical saturating the world's food supply. Money has bought aspartame its position of power - not quality of goods. People are getting very sick and weak from aspartame. That is true and very real. Good luck in your quest for perfection, truth, and understanding. Our food supply is a web of confusion in modern times. Money, greed and power are at the root of too many modern foods. Politics interferes with human survival and health. Sad, but true. What do we do? Get back to the basics of eating and drinking so to feed our bodies and our minds what nature intended. Slow down, take time to meditate and get to know yourself.

Be happy with who you are and don't strive for more than you need. To open the door to future health, we must find the keys from the past. There lie the answers of simplicity and health. There is so much to say on this issue. The roots run deeply into the self, politics, governments, and greed. All you can do is be the best individual you can be, stay unattached to dependencies and quick fixes. Look at the motives of those who push these 'drugs' on society and decide for yourself why this benefits you above profit. If you can see no goodness or purity in a product, put it back on the shelf. Wishing you and Singaporeans well. Keep spreading the word about aspartame and always stay open-minded. Dr. Hull is a Licensed Certified Nutritionist, certified fitness professional, and author of the best selling book, Sweet Poison. She currently holds a Doctorate in Nutrition, a Master's Degree in Environmental Science, is an international geographer and geologist, a former university professor, firefighter and Hazardous Waste Specialist and Emergency Responder. Dr. Hull writes a monthly newsletter covering a wide range of important health topics including Government Safety Alerts, Q and A's, and more!

Overseas calls should have included calls to foreign governments and foreign companies that had any kind of expertise that we could have used to stop the well. It does not appear any of those calls were made since it took months and months to cap the darn well. We also now know that some foreign entities did offer their help only to have their calls symbolically not returned. Imagine if the President had made those calls and how much better the world might be today. Humanitarian aid might be reaching the Gaza Strip in the absence of any deaths, Israel and Turkey might be on better speaking terms if they were brought together to work on a peaceful flotilla, we might be talking about the opening of the NFL season rather than a religious book burning or a controversial mosque in NYC, Obama's foreign policy relative to the Muslim world might still be intact rather than in imminent danger, the President might be governing a more united country if he had reigned in the name calling of ordinary American citizens, and the Gulf and the Gulf states might have incurred far less damage than they did from the BP well. This article was generated with Essay Freelance Writers.

The American dream has always been a staple of American culture. When people speak of it, they often refer back to the first half of the 20th century. Despite this, the American Dream is just as relevant to American culture today as it was in the last century. In this essay, we will explore the American dream and just what it is. Firstly, it’s important to mention the American dream isn’t measured based on what an individual has. It has to be measured on its principles and how they apply to society. Although the American dream isn’t as distinct from the rest of the world as it once was, it still makes America what it is today. The first part of the American dream is the dream of abundance. The dream of abundance is the ability of America to have a country filled with material goods. It remains the envy of the world today as a nation of producers and consumers. This data has been created by Essay Writers.

Few countries can match the sheer range of goods America has. Next, we have the dream of a democracy of goods. This is the ability of everyone to purchase the goods of America, regardless of where they come from and who they are. It links back to the constitutional right of everyone to be free and equal. To fulfil this part of the constitution, the dream of a democracy of goods has to exist. The dream of freedom of choice is the third part of the American dream and, again, ties back in to the American constitution. It allows people to fashion their own lifestyles using the goods on offer. People have the freedom to be who they want to be, and they aren’t restricted by the supply of goods on offer. Finally, we have the dream of novelty. This represents a broadening of consumer choice. Fashions are allowed to change at will.

It has a deep impact on American society. It means the current skills in demand are forever changing. The people don’t have to specialise in specific areas just to get along in life. They can be sure there will always be a demand for niche skills, which allows them more freedom of choice. One can say the American dream has been born out of the constitution. It’s the constitution that allows it to exist. Without click to get info enshrined in this document, the American dream wouldn’t be able to persevere. Today, the American dream is still relevant. How people achieve this dream has changed, but the basic principles of it haven’t. The difference today is young people may go to college instead of an apprenticeship to go about their pursuit of the American dream. In conclusion, the American dream is about both choice in the consumer industry and unlimited freedom of choice. These are principles Americans demand in everything they do. In many ways, the American dream has grown to symbolise more than just the consumer industry. The American dream is a symbol of a strong America as a whole.

I imagine that few would disagree with me. It was by altering and changing these relationships between the different groups that a better, more peaceful terms of living came about. So, when we decide to examine the social mores and relationships of our own era, and discover such large amounts of suffering, the only reasonable response to these situations is this: we must reorganize society, change the relationships, repair (or revolutionize) the system itself, before we will stop seeing the damage that it causes. What we would be doing would be a revolutionary activity, in that we would be altering our own world to attain our own ends, in the most radical way possible. It would also be the tradition of spirited independence to overthrow oppressors and cast off any chains or bondage they have given to the innocent. Our questions must be twofold. 1) What are the relationships that are causing so much stress, misery, pain, and suffering on others? 2) What can we do to change them?

The United States is the land of the free, but to truly be free Americans must take hold of all the freedoms that are taken for granted. Some freedoms we have are the freedom of speech, freedom of religion, the right to marry for love, and the right to a free education. Americans are obligated to use the freedoms to our advantage. The one freedom that we should use more frequently is freedom of speech. In the United States freedom of speech must be used more often. We have this freedom, but few choose to use it. Many people do not speak up for what they believe in and this causes problems. When people do not speak their minds, nothing changes because no one says what they want. In other countries if a person speaks their mind he or she will be considered a threat to the government and will have to face the consequences. This was generated by Essay Freelance Writers.

Another freedom that we need to exercise is freedom of religion. Freedom of religion is a very big obligation to Americans. With the varying religions comes the responsibility to choose one or none depending on what a person feels. In this country you are free to choose your religion, but in many countries you cannot do that. Also in many countries you are made to die for your religion whether you want to or not. Along with our freedoms we have many rights. One major right Americans have that we must use is the right to vote. We are one of the few countries that have a democracy and we do not want to lose that. Many countries like Cuba and Afghanistan are ruled by pure dictatorship and they do not get to elect who they feel would be the best candidate to run their country. They just have to deal with an overbearing dictator and keep their opinions to themselves. That is why many people are immigrating to our country illegally. To be free we need to elect politicians that we think will make a difference for the better. This decision is not to be taken lightly.

Such a fundamental principle as an existent plan may be neglected and forgiven to some extent in our individual lives but for society as a whole, it is unforgivable as it provides no vision that we all can share. Miles have I travelled on earth and by sea Airliners, boats, trains and cars carried me. Buses and bicycles, skates and on foot of movement and travel I've known a lot. Australian birds include many fine and loved examples of this natural kingdom - the water birds, kookaburras, swallows, emus, eagles, swans and many others share our beautiful landscapes. Dogs are universally appreciated and gain our admiration and inspire us with their capacity for unconditional love. We are so used to considering ourselves as the centre of things and concerned with the affect other planets have upon our life here on Earth. But what is the influence the Earth has upon the other planets?

WHERE HAS MY LOVE GONE? Gone is my heart's love - from my heart and from hearth Gone from my bedside - no comfort left on earth Where is my heart's love who was so true and kind. At Christmas time when the birth of Jesus is celebrated as thanksgiving for spiritual guidance, it is also a time for intuitive response in knowing that each has the potential to follow His example and learn to express all the zodiacal energies blended and exemplified in the Christ through supreme Love. And it is love that is echoed throughout the centuries, love that is valued as a supreme quality now and always, love that is pure, generous and true. Love is the core of all spiritual teachings and spiritual teachers are always anticipated to be loving, gentle and kind as well as powerful in their stability to know and live by the Law of Life. We're miles apart - in distance and in differences of heart. I live in lands of vastness, desert, gorges, beaches, sea ans you dwell in tidy, safeness of small village, field, lea. Yours a gentle spirited land where ours is harsh, vivid, bold. Although the origins of life remain mysterious, we can all take comfort in our growing perception that natural life and creatures issue from the Divine Creative Intelligence following prescribed patterns according to Natural laws. We are thrilled to discern that order is such as to design patterns that vary only in their magnitude or minuteness as that of a solar system and an atom. Such awareness results in varying responses. Naturally a philosopher or mystic's reaction will be very different from an atomic scientist.

The United States of America is the first nation in our contemporary world to become a truly representative state, with no monarchs or kings ruling over it. This happened shortly following gaining their independence from the state of England, or, as we know it today, Great Britain. Although freedom in society essay happened more than 100 years ago, the men who negotiated and lead this new nation decided that they had to leave a legacy of equality and egalitarianism. They enacted the very first laws of the United States, the Bill of Rights, otherwise known as the very first 10 amendments. The first 10 amendments had been written with the common man in mind. Deep in the memory of all the different delegates from each of the 13 original states was the tyrannical oppression under the rule of a unelected and irreplaceable king. These delegates were within the Constitutional Conventions in 1787. Here, the drafted the Constitution, which was a sort of mission statement and company plan for the newly formed country.

A freedom, what a wonderful word! How much energy there is in it! How much opportunity, dream, even believe that only we ourselves determine our capacity to do something, to achieve new horizons, to acquire new skills. I am sure that each and every one of us has his or her own definition for this word. Someone believes it to be somewhat ephemeral, unachievable. But somebody has it like a deliberate way of life and for others it is a goal they crave it with all their heart. So, what is the enigma of this seems to be a simple word? And what is https://essayfreelancewriters.com/blog/freedom-in-america-essay/ of freedom in our life. By definition, freedom is the availability of choice. It is something when you can chose whether you want to do it or not. We can help with writing your essay about Freedom now! Freedom is a very broad concept that can have a different meaning in each case. For help with essay, please contact https://essayfreelancewriters.com.

As it can be the freedom of choice of your development direction or your actions, the freedom in decision making, in planning your schedule, the finance freedom, the freedom of thought, the freedom of speech, the freedom of your body and soul, the freedom in choosing the partner or a colleague. People see their meaning in this word. Someone sees there sadness and doubt, someone sees hope and optimism, and someone else is just afraid of this word and the consequences it brings. Because freedom is the right to choose and to choose, means make a decision, which is the process that implies responsibility. It is impossible to live in society and to be free of it. We are all children of our society. And whether we want it or not, we always have to live according to the society rules and foundations. The rules that are constantly changing, reconsidered, amended, but that is how it is. From our early childhood, we were taught that we are to live for the sake of common good and not for ourselves. But the there was always this tiny part of ourselves was inevitably formed, determined, and controlled by society we are living in. We were taught this way by our parents, our school teachers because some time ago they had been taught too, and we, in turn, will also teach our children to live by the society rules. Can you see the word “freedom” anywhere here in these lines? No, there are only rules, limitations, and obligations. And so that such a life would not seems us some kind of a slavery, we have all the blessing of civilization, again according to some rules. It seems to that these blessings are what the freedom is all about. But it’s not. It is an imaginary freedom, not the real one, when we take all the responsibility for what is happening to us.

WE all have yearnings of the soul - yearnings not fully satisfied by our material life. We all seek for answers to the unanswerable and our intuition has to serve as our messenger for answers to these mysteries. Some find that love is the key. The arts are an integral part of our culture since classical times. The quality of Beauty has always been the inspiration behind creation in all the spheres of human effort whether painting, architecture, literature, sculpture, landscaping and other endeavours. We need to retain Beauty and harmony if we are to create enduring testaments to our skills, our purposes and our wisdom. We all have an imagination that conceives of some sort of future - for ourselves and for the world as a whole. Some predictions are seen to have been accurate, when in hindsight we have the advantage Otherwise to forecast universal events and even international ones is urging caution. However, we all must have a clear sense of a future in which we have self confidence to create our own life, and faith in Nature that commands Life as a Whole. This content has been created by Essay Freelance Writersversion.

Although our lives are being pressured into particular channels and ways of thinking and we are chastised for thought that is original or against the commonly accepted attitudes, this attempt to curb our freedom of thought is less potent than controlling our speech. Although both thought and speech are ultimately governed by us personally, there are external intrusive influences to make us cautious in expressing our viewpoint. Many may not wish to be labelled in some derogatory term that is not the common trend or passing fashion. Until recently, most people in the West were unfamiliar with the subtle and usually invisible part of the human psyche which radiates as energy of various kinds from the physical body of each one of us. Although modern science has developed and continues to develop technology to an extraordinary level that has influenced our progress in many ways from advances in surgery to sending astronauts into space, there has been little to help us to recognize the radiation of the energies from the human psyche.

The American dream has always been a staple of American culture. When people speak of it, they often refer back to the first half of the 20th century. Despite this, the American Dream is just as relevant to American culture today as it was in the last century. In this essay, we will explore the American dream and just what it is. Firstly, it’s important to mention the American dream isn’t measured based on what an individual has. It has to be measured on its principles and how they apply to society. Although the American dream isn’t as distinct from the rest of the world as it once was, it still makes America what it is today. The first part of the American dream is the dream of abundance. The dream of abundance is the ability of America to have a country filled with material goods. It remains the envy of the world today as a nation of producers and consumers. This data has been created by Essay Writers.

Few countries can match the sheer range of goods America has. Next, we have the dream of a democracy of goods. This is the ability of everyone to purchase the goods of America, regardless of where they come from and who they are. It links back to the constitutional right of everyone to be free and equal. To fulfil this part of the constitution, the dream of a democracy of goods has to exist. The dream of freedom of choice is the third part of the American dream and, again, ties back in to the American constitution. It allows people to fashion their own lifestyles using the goods on offer. People have the freedom to be who they want to be, and they aren’t restricted by the supply of goods on offer. Finally, we have the dream of novelty. This represents a broadening of consumer choice. Fashions are allowed to change at will.

It has a deep impact on American society. It means the current skills in demand are forever changing. The people don’t have to specialise in specific areas just to get along in life. They can be sure there will always be a demand for niche skills, which allows them more freedom of choice. One can say the American dream has been born out of the constitution. It’s the constitution that allows it to exist. Without the rights enshrined in this document, the American dream wouldn’t be able to persevere. Today, the American dream is still relevant. How people achieve this dream has changed, but the basic principles of it haven’t. The difference today is young people may go to college instead of an apprenticeship to go about their pursuit of the American dream. In conclusion, the American dream is about both choice in the consumer industry and unlimited freedom of choice. These are principles Americans demand in everything they do. In many ways, the American dream has grown to symbolise more than just the consumer industry. The American dream is a symbol of a strong America as a whole.

https://essayfreelancewriters.com/blog/freedom-in-america-essay/ imagine that few would disagree with me. It was by altering and changing these relationships between the different groups that a better, more peaceful terms of living came about. So, when we decide to examine the social mores and relationships of our own era, and discover such large amounts of suffering, the only reasonable response to these situations is this: we must reorganize society, change the relationships, repair (or revolutionize) the system itself, before we will stop seeing the damage that it causes. What we would be doing would be a revolutionary activity, in that we would be altering our own world to attain our own ends, in the most radical way possible. It would also be the tradition of spirited independence to overthrow oppressors and cast off any chains or bondage they have given to the innocent. Our questions must be twofold. 1) What are the relationships that are causing so much stress, misery, pain, and suffering on others? 2) What can we do to change them?

This is the Christmas Season. If you take “MAS” off the word Christmas, what do you have? I have and know people who are Jewish, and saying “Merry Christmas,” does not offend them. Of course, there will always be some who are. At Hanukkah, I remember to say “Happy Hanukkah,” and to those who celebrate Kwanzaa, I wish them a “Happy Kwanzaa”, out of respect. But today, there are some who want us to be politically correct in what we say. This country was founded on the basis of freedom…. When did this change? Why is it suddenly un-constitutional for me to say Merry Christmas? Why must I say “Happy Holiday” or “Seasons Greetings? ” Why is it suddenly a commercial holiday which begins the beginning of October? I consider myself a Christian, and as such I celebrate Christian traditions and holidays. If I were Jewish or a Muslim or Buddhist, then I would celebrate and defend those holidays. This post has been created by Essay Writers.

The diversity and ethnicity of the American population has made us unique. We celebrate our personal religious belief and are taught to tolerate the religious beliefs of others. Yet, there are others, those who have no faith, which wish to take away my rights to worship and celebrate feasts days based upon my beliefs. In their zeal to make things “politically correct”, they, in my opinion, have begun to erode those very principles upon which this country was built. You do not believe in God…. I can accept that. But, again I ask, why are you trying to take away my rights to believe? You dont want us to use the words “In God we trust,” or “So help me God.” All mention of God, or Biblical content is supposed to be taken out our public buildings. When we do not go along with what you or the ACLU feels is correct, we may go to jail, which is taking away my constitutional rights. Even the countries before the “Christian” Era allowed freedom of religion. Rome incorporated the religions of every country it conquered into their religious pantheon. So, again I ask, why do I have believe the same as everyone else? Christmas was and is a religious holiday. Not a Wal-mart, or Sears, or Macys or Kohls or Target holiday, although they would like to make it into one. Is it my imagination or are big commercial companies trying to change what should be a religious holiday into a commercial holiday. If that is the case, we need to relearn and teach our children that Christmas is not a season of receiving, but a season of giving. Then, those who do not have a belief system will just have to find something else to complain about. So…..”Merry Christmas”…….” Happy Hanukkah”…… “Happy Kwanzaa”. May your season be fill with joy, love and peace on earth.

This topic was explored within the Federalist papers and is still the underlying difference between different political parties. Finally, as "Democratizing Freedom" highlighted, liberty was also defined from the perspective of voting rights; that is, who had the right to vote was related to one’s economic opportunity and other factors such as gender, race and social class. This was evident based on the example provided of how the backlash of Pennsylvania elites had “radical potential” for political disruption. Ultimately, the fact that some people denounced the revolution epitomized the way in which society was carefully structured around those that had resources. As we have seen, social class, gender and race were not the only relevant factors in terms of the internal struggles of the American Revolution. Religious and political views were also important because the founding fathers expressed serious concern regarding toleration and allegiance to the new government. Finally, defining freedom and how it was related to economic opportunity and voting rights were relevant struggles as they would cause later social issues and wars in American history. Foner, Eric. "The Revolution Within." In Give Me Liberty: An American History. This blog post is provided free of charge and we encourage you to use it for your research and writing. However, we do require that you cite it properly using the citation provided below (in MLA format). Ultius, Inc. "Sample Essay on the American Revolution." Ultius Blog.

Distinguish between patriotism and political opinion. The true American tradition is freedom of political expression. Feel free to tell children that you disagree with some people, but emphasize their right to have their own opinion. 10. If you have a relative in the battle, or a family friend deployed in Iraq, the situation is much more difficult. Everyone, adults and children, will be anxious and troubled. You won’t be able to help it. Marshall your own fears with spiritual support from your religion, from relatives, from friends. Freedom in America Essay on the fact that your loved one is far more likely to return than to be killed or injured. Be extra careful not to have the TV on all the time, no matter how compelling it might seem. Reassure your children that Uncle Bob will be fine. Statistically, this is probably true -- and it does not help children to imagine the worst. Children today are subjected to influences that cause them to be unnecessarily fearful and anxious. A major source of this is television. TV coverage of war, terrorism, and violent crime are things we need to protect our children from if they are to have a chance to be children. Kids don’t need to shoulder adult burdens. The Rev. John Jackman, an ordained minister, is Executive Director of Comenius Foundation, an independent nonprofit that advocates for responsible television. Free reprint rights are granted for use of this article in web sites, e-zines, newspapers, magazines, and newsletters provided the above credit is included complete with the web site URL. The Rev. John Jackman, an ordained minister, is Executive Director of Comenius Foundation, an independent nonprofit that advocates for responsible television.

After almost a month of protests and people living in the streets, rocks being thrown, blood being spilled, and many injured, Egyptian President Mubarak finally resigns. There was partying and cheers from the streets all night. https://essayfreelancewriters.com/blog/freedom-in-america-essay/ had spoken and the people had won. The basis of any democracy is a government for the people and by the people. Go back to the 2009 Iranian elections, where Mahmoud Ahmadinejad was reelected, but not without a controversial victory. Much like Egypt but under different circumstances, people flooded the streets in protest, claiming that the vote was fixed and that voter fraud was the reason why Ahmadinejad was thrust back into office. Unfortunately there was also bloodshed and deaths. The Iranian ruling party tried to cover up their handling of this situation by not allowing the news media or cameras into the area. What they didn't factor in was the Internet age of Twitter and the social network.

Their atrocities were seen all over the world from cell phones and computers. It was called the "Twitter Revolution", but unfortunately it ended in the people being run off the streets and back into their homes by the force of the Iranian military. Now we come back to today, and right after the Egyptian conflict, the Iranian people are back in the streets and they are wanting a change. Will they succeed this time? We will just have to wait and see what comes from all this, but one thing is for sure, Iran's president, Ahmadinejad, can't keep blaming the U.S. At some point he is going to have to step up to the plate and admit that his people don't want him or his way of ruling the country. Are we starting to see a domino effect with these uprisings? Are there more Islamic countries that are in danger of this exact kind of reaction from its people? This data was done with the help of https://essayfreelancewriters.comversion.

I am a businessman and I use the Internet to market my business . The Internet has been a tremendous tool for companies all across the globe and now we are seeing new things that the Internet has a function for. If it wasn't for the Internet, these people in these very closed and restricted countries would never have an opportunity to hear the truth and see what is really going on in the world. The Internet has given them the ability to access the news from anywhere around the world, and this is a good thing. These corrupt governments, who want to force their ways and views down the people throats, have always used the cloak of secrecy, trying to keep or shade the truth from the people and use this lack of knowledge to control and manipulate everyone and promote their agendas. This was true of Hitler and every other evil dictator that has been drunk with power, and control. This post has been generated with Essay Freelance Writersversion.

Freedom can never be controlled and locked up in a prison, it always will find a way to escape, and many think that this is just the beginning. Other oppressed people will join the cry for freedom and like Egypt and Iran, be running through the streets in an effort to reclaim their nation and their lives. I think with all that is going on right now, we are seeing a very different side of these regimes. They claim freedom and fairness, but pictures and the voice of truth show a different story and their escape of responsibility by pointing their accusing fingers at America, and others, for all their short comings, is wearing very thin. The whole world is seeing what they are really made up of. Is this a good thing? It all depends on who takes the reins of power and control next. The Islamic Brotherhood was involved in the Egyptian protests and wants to be involved in the next ruling party. This group is the world's oldest and largest Islamic political group and calls itself conservative and non-violent. It condemns terrorism and the 911 attacks, but others say it is a terrorist organization with ties to Al-Queda. Is Egypt the first domino to fall in this long line of dominoes? Only time will tell, but like it or not, the world is watching.

Flag Day in the United States is a holiday of honor and national pride, a day to figuratively" rally round the flag." Flag Day has its origins in the Second Continental Congress. The original use of this design was to serve as the flag carried into battle (the Revolutionary War was still well under way). The flag was first carried in the Battle of Brandywine on September 11, 1777. In these early days of the United States flag, it was displayed on naval ships and eventually became accepted and honored by the new United States citizens and by foreign nationals as well. In 1778 Captain Paul Jones commanded the naval warship "the Ranger" on which the flag was placed. Upon arriving in a French port, the crew of the French naval ships saluted the flag. The original design is credited to Betsy Ross, and contains the familiar circle array of the 13 stars - for the original 13 colonies. Eventually as the country grew, the number of stars had to grow as well. Content was generated by https://essayfreelancewriters.comversion.

The next version had 15 stars, as Vermont and Kentucky joined the Union. This new flag came into being in 1795. click for more went through numerous iterations as new states were added to the country. However an issue was brewing over how the flag was being misused. Prior to 1897 a number of opportunists took the nationalistic feelings instilled in the flag's image as avenues to market their wares or political views. The flag became the backdrop to advertising or other questionable purposes. For example a marketer could post an add on a flag and wave it around in a crowd. An attempt was made to get federal legislation passed that would ban desecration of the flag. After failing at the federal level, Illinois, South Dakota, and Pennsylvania came out with state laws in 1897 that made it illegal to place any kind of markings on the flag, to use the flag in any kind of marketing, or to mutilate, trample, deface, or defile the flag.

It was not until 1968 that flag desecration became federal law. A flag was burned in New York City's Central Park to protest the Vietnam War. This law has been challenged many times since. At the heart of the issue is finding the balance between flag desecration and freedom of speech rights. In a 1972 decision, the Supreme Court held that Massachusetts could not prosecute a person who wore a flag on the seat of his pants. In 1974 the Supreme Court decided that freedom of speech overrode flag desecration in a case involving a person that affixed a peace sign over the flag in protest of the U.S. Perhaps the thorniest issue of recent times is the use of the words "under God" in the Pledge of Allegiance. In 2002 a Ninth Circuit Federal appeals court decided that reciting the Pledge of Allegiance is unconstitutional because of the line "one nation, under God." In 2004, however, the Supreme Court declined to hear a similar case, thereby leaving the inclusion of "under God" intact in the Pledge of Allegiance for most of the country.

This statistic was second to the African Americans. The Mexican Repatriation program sponsored by the US government during the Great Depression was intended for voluntary return to Mexico, however, it turned into a forcible deportation agenda. More than a million people faced deportation, and 60% of them were US citizens. The Zoot Suit riots in Los Angeles in 1943 were instances of racial violence against Latinos. Naval soldiers posted in the Latino community conflicted with the youth in the densely populated neighborhood. It is a phenomenon portrayed by features of a defined structure, attitudes, and institutions that disadvantage a particular racial group, though not through apparent mechanisms. Significant racial gaps in wealth prevail in the United States with gap factor of twenty between whites and African Americans as well as other races. Racial coding breeds ideas of crime and welfare used for systematically swaying public opinion and political views against the minorities. The March 2010 report of the US Sentencing Commission stated that offenders who were black received 10% longer sentences than their white counterparts for the exact same crimes in the federal system. As brought out in this racism in America essay, racism has been at the center stage throughout the history and development of the United States. Efforts put in the hope of eradicating racism are futile as there are interest groups that seem to counter these efforts or install new mechanisms to drive the racism agenda for particular gains.

On November 22, 1963 the United States of America was taken over by a powerful group of individuals that included a number of CIA special team operatives, some employees and officials of the government and members of the Mafia. They did this by killing President John F. Kennedy and putting their man, Lyndon Baines Johnson, in the White House. The group included FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover, Mafia Boss Carlos Marcello and Mafia Banker Meyer Lansky. Although these men are dead today their positions of power are well kept by their predecessors. I am not saying that the current FBI Director is one of them only that someone has the power that J. Edgar Hoover had. They accomplished their feat with criminals and assets inside the government that included J. Edgar's private army of State, County and Local government employees most of which were convinced it was their job to save the country from the National Security Threat of Communism. The ideology of self-preservation was bolstered by the military-industrial complex that reaped billions of dollars each year from the Vietnam War, something even President Eisenhower warned the country of only a few years back from Kennedy's execution. This post was done with Essay Writers!

The project Tocqueville undertook in writing Democracy in America was a highly ambitious one. Having seen the failed attempts at democratic government in his native France, he wanted to study a stable and prosperous democracy to gain insights into how it worked. His studies had led him to conclude that the movement toward democracy and equality of conditions‹while it had progressed the farthest in America‹was a universal phenomenon and a permanent historical tendency that could not be stopped. Since this democratic trend was inevitable, Tocqueville wanted to analyze it in order to determine its strengths and dangers so that governments could be formed to reinforce democracy's strengths while counteracting its weaknesses. Therefore, while Freedom in America Essay in America may at times seem to be a rather disorganized collection of observations and thoughts on American democracy, it is possible to gain a coherent sense of the work as a whole by looking at all of Tocqueville's various and sundry remarks through the lens of one paramount theme: the preservation of liberty in the midst of a growing equality of conditions. This data was written with the help of https://essayfreelancewriters.com!

Volume One, the more optimistic half of the book, focuses mostly on the structure of government and the institutions that help to maintain freedom in American society. Volume Two focuses much more on individuals and the effects of the democratic mentality on the thoughts and mores prevalent in society. Taking the work as a whole, one finds that main problems of a democracy are the following: a disproportionately high portion of power in the legislative branch, an abuse of or lack of love for freedom, an excessive drive for equality, individualism, and materialism. The elements that Tocqueville believes can most successfully combat these dangerous democratic tendencies are: an independent and influential judiciary, a strong executive branch, local self-government, administrative de-centralization, religion, well-educated women, freedom of association, and freedom of the press. First, let us examine the dangers that Tocqueville sees facing American democracy. Most of the problems lie in societal attitudes and tendencies, but there are a few institutional difficulties as well. The first of these is the preponderance of legislative power.

Because the legislature is most directly representative of the will of the people, democracies tend to give it the most power of all the governmental branches. Yet if there are not sufficient checks on this power, it can easily become tyrannical. A related constitutional issue that weakens the independence of the executive and therefore indirectly increases the power of the legislature is the ability of the president to be re-elected. At first glance it is not obvious why this feature of American government weakens the president's power. It would seem, in fact, to increase his influence by allowing him to remain in office longer. The problem is that if the President has hopes of being re-elected, he will lose much of his ability to make independent decisions based on his judgments. Instead, he will have to bow to the whims of the people, constantly trying to make them happy although they may not have the knowledge to judge what the best action for the country as a whole might be.

Indirectly, therefore, allowing the President to run for re-election increases the danger of the tyranny of the majority. Another problem with the constitutional organization of American democracy is the direct election of representatives and the short duration of their time in office. These provisions result in the selection of a mediocre body of representatives as well as in the inability of representatives to act according to their best judgment, since they must constantly be worrying about public opinion. By contrast, the Senate, whose members are elected indirectly and serve longer terms in office, is composed of intelligent and well-educated citizens. Perhaps it will be necessary to switch to a system of indirect election for representatives as well. Otherwise, the laws will continue to be mediocre and often contradictory. If the state of affairs continues, people may tire of the ineptitude of the system and abandon democracy all together. The overriding but more intangible danger facing democracies is simply their excessive love for equality. Article has been created with Essay Writers.

In fact, even the institutional problems are really only symptoms of this deeper mindset which all democratic peoples tend to have. The doctrine of the sovereignty of the people and the power of public opinion are corollaries to the idea of equality. If all are equal, then no one person has any basis to claim the right to rule over another. The only just way to run a society, therefore, is to base decisions on the will of the majority. Yet the problem with this idea is that it can quite easily lead to despotism. Despotism can come at the hands of a single person or a multitude. In the case of a democracy, there is a grave danger that the majority will become despotic. If there are no checks on the power of the majority to influence the government, then it will have absolute power and those in the minority will be helpless to resist. Perhaps even more insidious is the sheer moral force that that the opinion of the majority has on society.

Much has been said in recent years about the increasingly irresponsible news media. For those of us who remember Walter Cronkite, we are amazed by the sleazy depths to which our news media can go nowadays. Their present fascination with Anna Nichole Smith's death perfectly illustrates those depths. It is commonly speculated that the drive for increasing profits by the corporate owners of the news outlets, along with fierce and unanticipated competition from the cable channels and Internet blogs have motivated a new focus upon the lurid. I might add the media consultants who insist that appealing to the lowest common denominator, not hard news, brings and keeps viewers or readers. In spite of ourselves, we are especially fascinated by the downfalls and humiliations of our anointed celebrities. But my concern is not over this sleaziness. After all, we can still find, if we search, a few outlets that do focus upon the important world and local news.

A deeper and more insidious issue is the honesty of our journalists. I believe that most people go into journalism because they have an ideal of finding and sharing the truth about the people and issues that form our society. But, like most politicians, they gradually become distracted and compromised by the pressures to be profitable, to attract and hold viewers/readers, to lead with stories, to reinforce a political or social perspective, and to add a spin more interesting and attractive than the competitors on the other channels. And sometimes those pressures force a bending or complete loss of the truth. While I understand that most news outlets have an expressed, or more often unexpressed, political leaning, there remains the moral responsibility to be truthful. But what is truth in the context of reporting on events and people? Is it still being honest if we emphasize those aspects of the story that reinforce our viewpoint while de-emphasizing or ignoring those that don't? Are learn more serving our viewers and readers if we consistently vilify those in the opposing party while blindly praising and ignoring the faults of those in ours?

Or is that just being disingenuous? Should the news media be held accountable, as are the rest of us, when they libel or slander? Sure, occasionally a supermarket tabloid will lose a slander lawsuit, but seldom do the major newspapers or news channels face such sanctions. When the news media are criticized for their dishonesty, hypocrisy or bias, they cry freedom of speech and partisanship and few want to take them on. They have become relatively above reproach, compared to any other group. And yet no other segment of our society can so dramatically influence public opinion and political dealings. The news media no longer just report on events, they form and even create the events. They can make or break political candidates, drive legislation, manipulate the economy into and out of recessions, and even alter foreign policy. They have become a crucial element of our society largely above reproach. While there is a very real danger in interfering with the news media's ability to report and go wherever they need to go, they should be more aggressively held accountable when they are deliberately untruthful or manipulative. While our political leaders won't likely have the courage or will to take on the press, perhaps the relatively loose and free Internet will do more to expose dishonesty wherever and whenever it occurs.

If the spirit of trees is your choice of affection it will be their form, colour, usefulness, shade or produce that combines to offer much in return for your care, protection, cultivation and sensitive harvesting. Included in the love of life are the various natural kingdoms. One of the most popular of these is the realm of plants. In this we have much to learn and appreciate. It offers us great beauty, colour and design as well as food and medicine. No better life than one that you love. No better birth than a child born of love. And love makes the world go round, and round. Simple hint for happiness. It would seem to be a simple matter to convey a cherished concept of the goal for mankind that would also serve us as a personal inspiration and encouragement. However, it is a mental exercise that we should all practise if we are to hold a vision of a preferred future for our civilization. This was generated with the help of Essay Writersversion.