The Journaling of Hinton 389

With July 4 just around the corner, many people here in the United States are making plans for that day and weekend. Parades, camping, cookouts, taking a dip in the pool or lake - all these activities and more are popular over that mid-summer weekend. Many, of course, are common throughout the summer, but July 4 seems to epitomize summertime fun, especially grilling. How popular are grilling and barbequing on that day? Some folks will spend part of the day chasing down great deals on TVs, appliances, and furniture. Later that evening, Americans of all stripes will gather in parks and other public places for an eye-popping (and ear-banging) display of fireworks. Much like on Memorial Day, Americans tend to forget the meaning of July 4. We forget (or overlook) that the formal name for that day is Independence Day. What does that mean? We celebrate the courage of many brave souls who stood up to a formidable army and risked their lives fighting tyranny. Post was created by https://essayfreelancewriters.com.

There is much more to this notion of freedom. Every American should acquire and study a copy of the Constitution. It's an amazing document made even more amazing when you consider that its principles still apply today. Though Google - The Best Social Environment For Equal Opportunity have been revised and many are argued repeatedly, one thing all Americans agree on is that the fundamental desire to be free remains unchanged. Look at how this desire plays out in the world today. In recent days we have been treated to constant news reports about the growing democracy movement in Iran. New Essay Series Examines What It Means To Be Black In America of thousands of people have taken to the streets to protest what they feel is the rigged re-election of president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. They feel that the challenger, Mir Hossein Mousavi, deserves to be president. At least 20 people have been killed in clashes with police. Luckily, we in America--and in most of the free world, for that matter--enjoy peaceful transitions of power. What we're seeing in Iran is yet another example of a people yearning to be free. Though the government there is trying hard to crack down on demonstrations, common Iranians continue to protest. And get the word out: Twitter has become one of the more reliable forms of communication during this crisis. As Americans hunker down to their barbecue meals, picnics, and baseball games on July 4, let us hope that they take at least a moment to reflect on the true meaning of the day. Were it not for the selfless actions of ordinary citizens more than 230 years ago, our nation--indeed, the entire world--would be a dramatically different place today.

For A Diverse Array Of Rationales , random readers cannot edit WikiLeaks' source articles, unlike in Wikipedia. Naturally, because of the notoriety of the contents of many of WikiLeak's published articles, it has been subjected to several legal and political assaults and controversies. One of these was a 2007 video WikiLeaks released in April 2010, which involved a random firing in Iraq by a U.S. Reuters journalists, among a dozen other civilians. Remarkably, probably because of WikiLeaks' active avid supporters, it has managed to survive all attacks against it. It has stood its ground based on its deference to freedom of speech and media publishing, the improvement of common historical record and the support of the rights of all people to create new history. Among others, WikiLeaks' principles find legal basis in Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which provides for the people's right to freedom of opinion and expression without interference; and the right to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers. Another foundation is the landmark case involving the Pentagon Papers, wherein the US Supreme Court ruled that "only a free and unrestrained press can effectively expose deception in government".

The High Court further emphasized the free press' duty to prevent deceit of its people by any part of the government. While the government cannot absolutely prevent Wikileaks' publications on the ground of the Free Speech Clause it could, however, curtail it by coming after its active cohorts. In fact, said service provider is said to have just recently withdrawn its services after its relationship with WikiLeaks was being questioned by the U.S. Senate Homeland Security Committee. WikiLeaks now claims being currently hosted by servers in Europe. Many cite Sweden due to its strict protection of journalists' sources or whistle-blowers, which is said to be actually enshrined in its constitution. Evidently, there is no showing that WikiLeaks is shrinking amidst this newer campaign against it. It remains strong in its belief that although it cannot assure successful prosecution of cases against key persons involved in the disclosed hullabaloos, eventually, transparency in government transactions would lead to a more informed, vigilant and involved citizenry. Data was generated by Essay Writers!

So many times when we celebrate Red Ribbon Week we only think about not taking drugs. Students get tired of the no, don't do that message. They want to hear something else. Well, if you think about it this should be a week to celebrate freedom. If we don't take drugs then we have a lot of freedoms that we can cherish. Some of those freedoms that we should be talking to them about is the freedom from being tied to a very dangerous habit. Not taking drugs helps us enjoy the freedom from dying from an overdose. Another freedom we have is the freedom from having the urge to steal to feed a horrible habit. How about celebrating the freedom from having something or someone else control our life. Then there is the freedom from illness and sickness caused by living in filthy conditions because we really don't care.

This article has been done by Essay Freelance Writers!

Also, we should include in these freedoms the freedom from illnesses that are related to drug, alcohol, and tobacco abuse. Last of all we are free to age naturally instead of rapidly. Remember that we could emphasis the yes, can, do all the healthy things that are not related to taking drugs, drinking or abusing tobacco. We should spend a lot of time teaching the students what freedoms they will enjoy if they stay off of drugs. Here is a list of some of the things people would be free to do. Free to have healthy bodies that can exercise and move as they should. If we stay off of drugs then our bodies will be healthier and we will probably live a lot longer on this earth. Clean lungs that are tobacco free take in lots more oxygen with less exertion than dirty lungs that have to work overtime to do the same job.

When How Ridiculous Is This Justification? do not take drugs, use alcohol or abuse tobacco we have control over what our bodies are doing and how they feel. Improving Your Life And Career With True Freedom from being imprisoned in jails and penitentiaries because of breaking the law of the land. Many drug users blame society, but students need to have it pointed out to them that people that break the law chose to be where they are and it is their own fault not societies fault. When we abstain from drugs, alcohol and tobacco we have the freedom to have control over our minds and our speech. We will not easily be controlled by others who know we are only functioning with part of our ability. We will be able to control what we say and how we say it without making fools of ourselves. The use of drugs restricts our freedoms and this concept needs to be pointed out to our students. They need to know the pluses to not taking drugs besides the negatives about taking drugs. So take the time to let students see that when they choose not to take drugs they choose freedom. This can be done by using a play showing all the things that you can do.

Historians have often times struggled with understanding the holistic impact of the American Revolution. This essay, written by one of the talented writers at Ultius, dissects early U.S. America’s struggle for freedom was not solely fought against Great Britain, but involved domestic challenges which hampered the new Republic from immediately becoming the land of liberty. In discussing the American revolution, the role of individual liberty and equality is at the forefront of important matters. While the war was viewed holistically as struggle between Great Britain and the colonists, there were also important internal issues among the colonists themselves. Unlike the French revolution, the War for Independence sought the establishment of a new nation, not simply humane treatment within an existing one. In America, the equality of people among different social classes, races and genders played a serious role in terms of determining what kind of nation would most effectively foster equality. In Eric Foner’s Give Me Liberty, chapter six offered insight into how these internal struggles manifested and what kind of implications they had.

While matters such as social class, race and gender were important during the American Revolution, these factors were just few of many others related to the broader theme of equality. Throughout the secondary accounts of various social issues during the revolution, other facets of society such as religion and political views were also relevant to the discussion. Mainly, religious freedom was something that was also taken into account. In the segment titled "Toward Religious Toleration", the author outlined that church and state had to be separated in order to ensure that people’s views were not used as means by which others were oppressed. James Madison even outlined that the United States of America would be a haven for those that were religiously oppressed in other nations. Why Are There Homeless Veterans? paid towards religion reflected a much broader focus on holistic freedom. The revolution was also a struggle with regards to freedom of opinion. For instance, The Limits of Liberty outlined that loyalists, or “those who retained their allegiance in the Crown,” were forced to swear allegiance and even chose to emigrate in some instances. This represented the nature of internal struggles within the revolution that extended beyond just Great Britain.

Religion is important to Americans: Seventy-six percent belong to a religious group, according to the Pew Research Center. And there are about 3,000 religious groups in the United States. The central place of religion in Americans’ lives and the diversity of religions practiced is a testament to the value placed on religious freedom. The idea that people should be able to follow their conscience in how they worship has been part of the American identity since its beginning. Religious freedom is enshrined in the U.S. Constitution. The First Amendment of the Constitution says that “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof … .” These words, known as the Establishment Clause, are the basis of ongoing debate in the U.S. They have required the court to strike a delicate balance between not endorsing a particular religion and not suppressing people’s free expression of religion. Courts have ruled against overtly religious displays on public land, but they have also ruled in favor of public funds being used to support religious clubs at public universities. This data has been written by Essay Writersversion!

Tocqueville attributes the failure of the French Revolution mainly to the overwhelming administrative centralization which took away the citizens' ability to exercise their freedom, making them lose a taste for it and forget how to exercise it. Non-institutional factors which help to maintain freedom in the United States are the right of association, the freedom of the press, and‹most importantly‹religion. Associations are an excellent tool to combat individualism and to allow people to exercise their freedom by taking a part in politics. The press is intimately connected to associations in that associations need a means of communicating with their members and also a means of spreading their message to the public as a whole. In America, religion is much more than another type of association and is highly beneficial both politically and societally. Religion teaches people how to use their freedom well. Since the government provides no absolute standards, it is necessary that religion provide some moral boundaries.

As Tocqueville remarks, "Despotism may be able to do without faith, but freedom cannot. . . . How could a society escape destruction if, when political ties are relaxed, moral ties are not tightened? And what can be done with a people master of itself if it is not subject to God?" (Chapter 9). By bringing people together in a community of common belief, religion also combats individualism. Furthermore, religion is practically the only means of counteracting the materialistic tendencies of democratic peoples. Religion turns peoples minds beyond the physical, material aspects of life to the immortal and eternal. One can clearly see that most, if not all, of the divergent strands of Democracy in America come together when examining the relationship between freedom and equality in society. Above all, Tocqueville has a passionate love for liberty and is concerned to point out the dangerous trends that threaten to destroy it as well as the means by which it can be preserved. In the last few lines of the book, Tocqueville writes, "The nations of our day cannot prevent conditions of equality from spreading in their midst. But it depends upon themselves whether equality is to lead to servitude or freedom, knowledge or barbarism, prosperity or wretchedness." Tocqueville's hope is that through the insights he has communicated in this work, humanity will be better able direct themselves toward freedom, knowledge and prosperity.

From the words expressed in these government documents, freedom is related to man’s independence. Without independence and the right to self-govern Americans would be unable to have liberty, prosperity, nor happiness. After the end of the Revolutionary War and America gained independence, the concept of freedom changed. During the 1800’s the concept of freedom was based on the literal interpretation of free and freedom of enterprise. These interpretations of freedom were related to the institution of slavery. In the Letters from an American Farmer, the farmer expressed his love for the New World and his freedom. His freedom was associated with his enterprise. The farmer considered himself doing well. He prided himself on his pounds of meat in storage and owning land. The farmer also owned slaves. He considered them happy and fed. His freedom was his economic empire, his liberty to own livestock and farm land. The farmer lived during the first part of the 1800’s after the Revolutionary war. During the 1850’s and 1860’s there was much advocacy against slavery.

The Republican Party is in a crisis right now. It is not due to the Democrats taking over control of Congress. It has to do with losing the vision of conservatism. If anything, Republicans lost Congress because they have lost the vision of political conservatism that Ronald Reagan brought to this country. They have allowed themselves to be cowed by the sheer amount of noise that the left has generated in attacking conservative principles. This wall of noise has fooled Republican leadership into thinking that conservatism is not popular in America, that the people want liberalism. In fact, nothing could be further from the truth. A 2003 Gallup poll showed that 40% of Americans identified themselves as conservative, 40% said they were moderates, and 20% said they were liberal. A similar survey from the 60s showed that this percentage has not changed in the last 50 years. So what is the conservative vision?

1. America is the greatest country in the world because it offers the maximum amount of individual freedom. There can be no security anywhere in the free world if there is no economic stability within the United States, the last best hope of man on earth. 2. Government is beholden to the people. It derives its power from the people. 3. Outside of its legitimate functions, government does nothing as well or as economically as the private sector. 4. The welfare state and government handouts are the way downward for the United States. 5. Progressive taxation, where those with higher incomes pay virtually all of the taxes, is the creation of those who wish to achieve changes in our social order by redistribution of wealth. 6. The doctors fight against socialized medicine is your fight. You cannot socialize the doctor without socializing the patient. 7. People are better able to plan their own lives than a small intellectual elite in a far-distant capital. Its amazing to think that Reagan made that speech in 1964. Its conservative vision shaped his Presidency from 1980-88, and is still very relevant to us today. This data was written with Essay Writers.

Times have changed somewhat since 1964, though much remains the same. Three institutions, the family, religion, and the schools, are pillars that elevate society and educate people in the principles that create order in society. If you destroy these institutions, then chaos will eventually ensue in society. The left is working hard at destroying each of these institutions today. When there is unrestrained chaos, it is easier for the socialist to sell his dream of greater government control. Although it is not without its flaws or mistakes, America is still the greatest country on earth, specifically because of its maximum individual freedoms. Its economic prosperity is directly due to its greater personal freedoms. America is not the cause of all the problems in the world. The opposite is true. Because America is the greatest country in the world, it is worth defending. The purpose of the military is to defend America and it is not a crime to do so. The Constitution is an historical, not a “living” document.

The job of the judiciary is not to create new laws but to interpret the Constitution. Survival success is caused by hard work, discipline, training, and natural ability. The greater survival success of a specific group does not mean that it has victimized another group that has achieved less success. It means that the group that has succeeded worked harder, had better discipline, training, and natural ability. If you want more of something, subsidize it. If you want less of something, tax it. In other words, incentives work and they matter. If you incentivize a non-survival behavior like not working (as in welfare) youll get more of that behavior. If you penalize a survival behavior like creating a business or making money (as in progressive taxation) youll get less of it. Industrialists and entrepreneurs do not victimize or oppress a person by giving him a job, they help him. Jobs do not appear out of thin air. They are created by industrialists or entrepreneurs seeing a market opportunity, creating a product or service, and figuring out how to market and sell it. This is a rare ability. Not everybody can do it.

Therefore these people are valuable and should be encouraged and rewarded, not persecuted. Profits are not obscene. Profits are good. Businesses are supposed to make a profit. In fact, they need to make a profit in order to survive. The earliest settlers on this continent came for freedom of religion. This should be a cornerstone of conservatism now. Freedom for any religion that one chooses. Religion is one of the major civilizing influences in our society. And the vast majority of Americans oppose the attempted removal of religious expressions or symbols from the public square. We are a nation of immigrants. But since we did not steal our prosperity, we do not need to give it away to others as a way of propitiation or apology, especially to those who break the law to come here. Living in the most free and prosperous nation in the world is a privilege, not a right.

Among the talked about issues on democracy involve basic grantable rights such as free speech and right to privacy. Freedom of expression as clearly emphasized in the constitution is but a cardinal thread of tenet that no one should misinterpret in any way. So does right to privacy is a guaranteed liberty right stated in the constitution that, just the same, cannot be violated. However, all freedom that is embodied in the constitution cannot be absolute as it is always partnered with responsibility. Thus the issue of crimes and lawlessness come in. In the event that a person overly exercised his claimed freedom to the extent that others' are suppressed, then said freedom is void and no longer grantable. The issue on the right to privacy is often opened up during employment process whereby a background check is conducted. Many companies would implement background checks for employment verification in order to be sure of the people they invest in and put in their companies. This has been created by Essay Writers!

Just as one CEO chided to confirm the statement; "With small businesses, every new employee is a huge cost to the organization so it's important to get the right ones." An employer has all the right to check on the applicants but they are bounded by rules set by every state and by the federal government. An employer can check on the history of an applicant but only with his or her consent or else said process cannot be used as basis to determine his or her application's result. An instance happened wherein an employer used a police report to verify the credibility of the applicant for his company. The police report generated two allegations of a minor crime and some arrests of alleged driving incompetency. All the records that was turned out was not yet filed into courts thus no resolution or judgment took place. The employer, upon knowing of the said allegations, immediately denied the application. Too unfortunate though for the applicant he did not review that the police reports could have violated his right to privacy and the employer thus abused his liberty to information. The presented contrasts are just some of the many mind boggling issues that confront background check, rights, and freedom. But the more that people are being exposed to these kinds of issues, they are given the chance to weigh things. Just as how freedom should be practiced with responsibility so should rights.

That being said, the second amendment of the constitution was created in order to protect the rights of persons to have and carry arms. Fast forward to the 20th and the 21st century, the 20th century had considerable debate pertaining to whether the amendment protects individual rights or collective rights while the second amendment in the 21st century has been focus of renewed academic review as well as judicial interest. In acknowledgment of the necessitate to arm the public as a militia is no longer a concern, but realizing that firearms are a part of the history as well as the culture of America, and Americans need firearms for both personal defense as well as sport. Ownership of guns is a right indeed - but it is also a huge obligation. With the obligation comes the interest of society to make certain that guns are used safely and are used by individuals who are properly trained and licensed. If a consensus is attained on this simple premise, it then will not be too difficult to iron out the details and to find an appropriate compromise.

My wife and I went to Frankenmuth Michigan, the other weekend. We usually go up there once or twice a year. That's where I proposed to my wife, so it holds some sentimental value for us. It is also the biggest Christmas town in America. Frankenmuth, is the world's largest Christmas store. If you love Christmas, I encourage you to visit Bronners in Frankenmuth. It is so decorated with lights, horse drawn carriage rides through the small town, it is so beautiful. Frankenmuth was founded by German immigrants back in 1845. The town is called Little Bavaria , and it will take you back to a taste of the German way of living. The people are friendly, peaceful and ready to show you around. While we were enjoying our dinner, I started to look around the dining room. There were Asian people, Indian people, and Muslims, all enjoying their meals with their families, just like I was.

There were no looks, no remarks, just people enjoying an evening out. Lots of cameras taking pictures, as this is a town that has people from all over the world that come to visit. Presidents, heads of States, famous actors, athletes, you name it, there have been a ton of famous and different people come here for the same reasons that I come here for. If you go to Bronners, you will see all their pictures plastered all over the walls. I started to think to myself, "What is America?" Why is there such immigration to America? All these different people make up who we are. There is no other place in the world like the United States. We are unique in the fact that a person can come here and have every advantage as anyone else, for freedom and the right to pursue happiness and a better way of life. Remember when we had to say this every morning in school?

Skokie, Illinois. Do you remember? The Nazis announced they would march in this Chicago suburb, a predominantly Jewish neighborhood, right down the street from where I live. It was actually More than Jewish in those days. It was Holocaust survivors. 5 Rights, Americans, Must Protect who were there. A legal battle began. The Nazis won. But after they won, they canceled their Skokie plans. Over a year of court wrangling for what? Some say only the lawyers won. But the issue all this brought up needs to be looked at well. And that issue is not just Israel's right to be. It is just how far we take freedom of speech. For the Christian, the water gets fairly murky. Just how free is the believer to speak his mind? Christ actually puts many controls on His people for their own good. Does Christ grant His own what the constitution grants the American? Unlimited freedom to curse, to complain, to vilify? Certainly Mohammed would not permit free speech regarding his god. Are we clinging to an American ideal when we praise the idea of free speech? Should we equate Americanism with Christianity? Should we fight for the right to speak about Jesus anywhere? Do we then as Americans fight for the atheist's right to spit on our God? For the Muslim's right to praise Allah and spread his faith? Will there be Freedom Of The Press - HISTORY of speech in the Millennium? Surely no one is permitted to come against Christ the King verbally then? Should they be allowed now? I only put out questions today, not answers. But it seems to me a person could be an excellent American citizen without being much of a Christian at all. Let's keep remembering where our citizenship really is.

Its only when we understand the distinction between real and false power, can we hopefully make better choices in order to experience life fully with purpose, meaning, inner peace, fulfillment, real joy and self-worth while living in harmony with the world around us. While real power, which is driven by power of love, empowers others and is expansive by nature, false power, which is driven by love of power, overpowers others and is restrictive by nature. Ultimately one leads to destruction and chaos while the other to construction and prosperity. So here is a condensed guideline for identifying true power: - True power, which is characterized by integrity, giving, and the honoring of all living things, has the ability to see the unity in all living things. When a high vision is aligned with universal laws, real, constructive power is inevitable and easily accessible. Knowledge is true power, but only when used correctly as a tool to make a difference. True power is aligned with our spiritual essence (remember we are spiritual beings experiencing the human experience and not the other way around). Therefore, everything we do is spirit-filled and spirit-directed. Content has been generated by https://essayfreelancewriters.com.

True power seeks to reconnect us with our spiritual roots – the foundation of our existence and true prosperity. True power seeks to build and embrace positive concepts of morality, integrity, spirituality and a wholesome values system, all of which give us access to the unlimited positive power that builds and creates total prosperity. True power builds and creates in a win-win spirit, helping you make a living while making a difference. True power does not fall victim to the misconception that external riches have the power to give us internal riches of meaning, purpose, inner peace, fulfillment, real joy and self-worth. True power, which recognizes the spirit that connects us all, recognizes that diversity is the mosaic of life that needs to be celebrated. It brings people together by going beyond superficial boundaries of color, race and religion. True power heals, transcends pain and transforms, especially during uncertain times. True power inspires people to become somebodys hero and be the change they wish to see in the world, thus giving meaning and purpose to their existence. True power creates real joy and inner peace that comes from helping others become a magnet of real joy and total prosperity. This content was written with the help of Essay Freelance Writersversion.

True power is synonymous with high vision, hope, purpose and meaning. Anything short of that is false power, a power which is short-lived and meaningless in the scheme of all creation. Perhaps its time to draw a line in the sand, declare your freedom from false beliefs and mind control by others who may not have your best interests at heart and reclaim your own true and unlimited power thats waiting to express itself positively. Or perhaps its time to think of ourselves as citizens of the world and come together, if only for the sake of the next generation whose future should not be unfairly stolen from them. In What Does It Mean To Be American? , only when the power of love overcomes the love of power, and superficial barriers such as race, religion and ignorance are removed, can we finally hope to experience true inner and outer peace and harmony, healing and total prosperity.

Normal Rockwell prints are a great example of American art from the 20th century. Rockwell was a key artist from this time as his prints remain very popular with the art public in the modern day. This article brings his best prints to your attention and also examines his life and career in detail. Rockwell began as a magazine illustrator before achieving fame as a skilled oil painter. Later in his career he also used his skills to tackle key social issues of that period after his confidence as an artist had grown considerably. By the end of his career, Norman Rockwell had helped set up a museum to house the best of his works close to his American home. It remains today and houses the largest collection of Norman Rockwell works, including prints, posters, covers, images, pictures and more. Is Privacy Right Paramount Than Freedom Of Expression? are also frequently reproduced for fans as stretched canvases, giclee art prints and unframed posters. Post was created with the help of Essay Writers!

When Ned gets to work, his emails and phone calls are being monitored not only by his boss, but by various federal agencies that have been authorized by the government to spy on him, since Americans are now considered to be guilty of anti-social or anti-government acts, and must prove that they are not guilty, if the government demands it. The presumption of innocence, which is one of the foundations of our freedom, is gone. Ned is very careful of what he says in his phone calls and his emails, knowing they are being heard and read by people looking to catch him in an illegal act. Ned, by the way, is so law-abiding that he hasnt ever torn off the labels attached to his mattresses that threatens him with the phrase, “It is unlawful to remove this lab! ” much less thinking about blowing up a plane, but in America 2010, he is guilty until proven innocent. Yes, it is necessary to protect ourselves. No, monitoring billions of communications a day is not the way to do it. Every day, in some part of America, laws are being passed by governments that continue to erode the freedoms that make a mockery of the constitutional guarantee of each of us having been born with the inalienable right to Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness. Despite his campaign promise to restore our civil rights as citizens of America, and to make government smaller, President Obama has accelerated the growth of his government, and given his stamp of approval to unconstitutional laws that make us less free. So much for “change.” Its been business as usual.

Other notable figures are: Susan B. Anthony , Zechariah Chafee Jr. , and Alexander Meiklejohn . At a time when a woman's voice did not carry far, Susan B. Anthony was determined to speak publicly and freely. Chafee was a strong twentieth-century proponent of free speech, and likened the First Amendment "to a barricade behind which journalists, authors, and speakers had a chance to pursue and present the truth" (Stevens 1982). Lastly, Consequences Of Religious Freedom In America is another influential twentieth-century figure who has written extensively on the topic of free speech. American Civil Liberties Union: Founded in 1920 as a nonprofit and nonpartisan organization, the ACLU is designed to defend American citizens' civil liberties. Basically, it is the ACLU's contention that despite an individual's race, sexual orientation, religious beliefs, or disabilities, every person in the United States should possess the same basic rights. Amnesty International: A worldwide organization that campaigns for human rights for all people. National Association for the Advancement of Colored People: An organization created to abolish segregation and discrimination and to create equal opportunities for quality housing, employment, education, voting and constitutional rights. American Civil Liberties Union. Clotfelter, Charles T. and Thomas Ehrlich. Philanthropy and the Nonprofit Sector in a Changing America. Hammack, David C. Making the Nonprofit Sector in the United States. Meiklejohn, Alexander. Political Freedom: the Constitutional Powers of the People. National Archives and Records Administration. Stevens, John D. Shaping the First Amendment. Tedford, Thomas L. Freedom of Speech in the United States.

The headline looked common enough: School Sued Over MySpace Photo Response. Apparently a woman was denied a teaching degree on the eve of graduation because she published her picture captioned "Drunken Pirate" on her MySpace. The photo, apparently taken at a 2005 Halloween party, showed Stacy Snyder wearing a pirate hat while drinking from a plastic "Mr. Goodbar" cup. The Life Of A Child - Free Article Courtesy Of ArticleCity.com , dean of the School of Education at Millersville University in Millersville, Pennsylvania, took exception to Snyder's photo, accusing Snyder of promoting underage drinking. Although Snyder apologized, she learned the day before graduation that she would not be awarded an education degree or teaching certificate. Snyder was instead granted a degree in English last year. Snyder, who is now 27 and reportedly works as a nanny, has sued Millersville University, seeking $75,000 in damages. All of this raises some interesting questions about how this legal action will play out in court if it gets that far.

Freedom of speech is something that every American is entitled to. It is your civil right to speak freely without censorship. Thus, you can speak your mind when you want to whomever you wish. However, there is a happy medium, and it's important that you understand there is a big difference between having an opinion and making threats to another person. Furthermore, you also have the right to privacy. Therefore, if you ever encounter emails of a harassing or offensive nature, you don't have to put up with them. Receiving threats of any type (I.E. physical harm, legal action), defamation or uncalled for belligerent messages, can be very upsetting. What's more, it can be frustrating to have you inbox cluttered with this unwanted mail. What should you do? You have a few options. Don't reply to the message. You may be tempted to, but no matter how you respond the chances are it will do little to deter the harasser or prankster from their quest of badgering you.

Moreover, by ignoring it, you may never hear from them again and you won't have to think twice about it. Find out who they are. If Why Are There Homeless Veterans? are receiving frequent emails from the same or different senders, you can continue to ignore them or send them a short email requesting that they stop contacting you. Do not stoop to their level by using profanity or making your own threats; keep it short, firm and to the point. Your request will likely not fix the issue, but once you've made it, it's time to see if you can find out who the person is. Free Essays On America - Land Of Opportunity? can be achieved by looking up their electronic mailing address with a reverse e-mail lookup. Simply type it into the query box on a site that offers this resource and see what is returned. You could learn their name, address, phone number and other data linked to them. Report the abuse to the senders ISP - You might want to inform the nefarious individual's Internet service provider of the harassment. This can usually be achieved by sending mail to [email protected](whatever their domain name is).com. Most ISP's will take your complaint seriously and after they look into the matter the harasser could very well lose their account. Delete your webmail account - If the problem becomes bad enough keep in mind that you can always save all the messages you want to keep, have your e mail deactivated and simply create a new one. As you can see, there is no need for you to worry about problematic e-mails. There are options. Also, don't forget that an email search is always there waiting to help you uncover the truth. For help with essay, please contact https://essayfreelancewriters.com.

What Makes America Great? has been in existence for decades. However, in the recent years due to change in governments and the overwhelming power of money, it is reasonable to say that it is under threat. It is largely brought about by the political class elected who have conflicting ideologies from their predecessors. In all democracies, the citizens have the power to choose the government in place through elections. It is viewed as one advantage especially in American Democracy. It gives a chance to the formation of a well-structured government, which helps in maintaining democracy. Many scholars have written on this topic including de Tocqueville who focused on the understanding of how a regarded as the stable and democratic government worked. De Tocqueville mainly focused on the issue of democracy in America. All the literature he developed surrounded issues of democracy and how the country managed to stay democratic. De Tocqueville had moved from France where he believed that democracy was still underdeveloped. He, however, viewed America to be one of the places that democracy was well developed. This has been generated with the help of Essay Writers!

Therefore, his aim was to gain an insight into how democracy remained stable in different areas around the world and especially America; he needed to understand the various strengths, and weaknesses of the concept so that various governments would identify how to maintain the strengths and mitigate the shortcomings. A theme that is present throughout the work is De Tocqueville view of democracy in America; he believes that despite all other aspects liberty remains stable in the land. He felt that the issue of freedom went beyond the government and the society had a significant role to play in what generated as liberty. He stated, “I speedily perceived that the influence of this fact extends far beyond the political character and the laws of the country and that it has no less empire over civil society than over the Government; it creates opinions, engenders sentiments, suggests the ordinary practices of life, and modifies whatever it does not produce” (De Tocqueville 16). He maintained some words that were American including the executive, Mississippi, Arkansas and Illinois. Despite the stability, he sees in the American democracy; he identifies various challenges with the system. The problems that de Tocqueville noted in the American Democracy was in societal attitudes and tendencies. He pointed out that democracy represents the will of the people and therefore because the legislatures are elected they tend to exercise more powers than the other organs. If this power is not controlled the political class will use their tyranny to exercise authority. Another problem where the representatives are elected for a short term, which contributes to mediocre leaders who only serve their interest and not of the people, they represent.

America was founded on the basis of freedom and opportunities. Diverse cultures sculpted America into the great country it is today. Short sentences like America is great! Freedom is a great thing! As an American , you have the right to voice your opinion, which is called the freedom of speech. Instead you can say As an American, you have the right to voice your opinon. This stated in the First Amendment of the Bill of Rights is known as Freedom of Speech. What Freedom Means To Me? is full of examples which is great, but don't keep saying for example just state it like Halloween, one of our most popular holidays especially with children, was brought to America by the Druids. As more people came to America, they brought with them different fashions and food with them. Pizza was brought to America by Italians in the late 19th century. As you can see, there are many things (i dont like that word but i cant think of another) that make America what is today. Without our freedom, numerous opportunities, and cultures America would be a different place today. Content has been generated with https://essayfreelancewriters.com!

Obama Administration: Very simple analogy here, " the Patriot Act." Passed during the Bush Administrating and rubber stamped renewed under the Obama administration we are rapidly approaching this Orwellian world of surveillance. The scary thing is that Orwell probably did not imagine how many ways this quote could come true today. From getting access to our library records, tapping our phones, tracking our movements via our cell phone signal, monitoring our emails, observing our social network activity, watching us via thousands and thousands of public video cameras to easy to get warrants and wire taps, the pervasive intrusion into our lives by the political class is the Orwellian nightmare we face today, a reality not conducive to freedom at all. Obama Administration: the best example of Obama Orwellian thinking under this quote is the failed economic stimulus plan that Obama and the Democrats passed. The original purpose of the stimulus plan was to create jobs.

Obama administration changed gears and stated the economic stimulus package was to both create AND save jobs. However, when Defamation Lawsuits And The Insurance Claims That Follow were created AND saved, the administration came up with the term like jobs "affected" or "touched" by the economic stimulus package. Thus, if the first definition does not work, try a second definition and a third definition, etc., anything to give an appearance of solidity to pure wind. In this case, the pure wind is the utter failure of the stimulus package to create solid jobs. Obama Administration: The best example here is the whole problem of illegal immigration and the immigration law passed this summer by Arizona, a law that was patterned after the existing Federal law regarding illegal immigration. The Obama administration has gone to court in an attempt to overturn a law that a state wants to use to return illegal immigrants to their respective countries, hopefully improving the living conditions of the state's citizens.

At the same time, the Obama administration has been returning record numbers of illegal immigrants to their respective countries and has beefed up security along the Mexico/U.S. Sounds like Doublethink to me: from the Obama administrationn perspective, we will vilify the Arizona law for doing the same thing we are doing at the Federal level, i.e. returning illegal immigrants to their countries. Doing the same think but holding one effort as bad but the other effort as good. Defamation Of Character And Libel On Social Networking Sites : This quote response is not just via the Obama administration but by the whole American political class.

When an employee named Pietrylo thought it would be funny to create a MySpace user group "Spec-Tator" so that current and former employees could vent about their experience working at his company, he started a legal firestorm. The user group was invitation only and required a password to enter and view. Spec-Tator quickly filled with complaints about the restaurant and the supervisors. When an employee let her supervisor in on the joke, the supervisor and employee had a good laugh. Soon afterward, a second supervisor demanded the employee's username and password to access the site. A federal lawsuit followed, with the former employees alleging their employer violated their freedom of speech, their common law right to privacy and the Stored Communications Act (SCA). Currently, a U.S. District Court is deciding whether employees need to fear discussing work-related topics on their own time on personally owned computers.

This article was generated with https://essayfreelancewriters.com!

When the company petitioned the Court to give it a summary judgment affirming its right to fire its employees for violating company polices, the District Court ruled in favor of the company on the issue of free speech, but said a jury needed to rule on the privacy and SCA issues, which prohibit intentionally accessing stored communications without authorization unless a user of the service okays the access. Key issues impacting the Court's decision included whether the employer unfairly coerced the employee to give her supervisor her user name and password and thus couldn't use the information it gained and whether the employees could legitimately expect privacy on an Internet-based, password protected forum. In defending the firings, the employer pointed out that the site's posts included sexual remarks about management and customers and references to violence and illegal drug use, all of which contradicted core employer values of professionalism, positive mental attitude, an aim to please approach and teamwork.

The Arrest Of Henry Louis Gates - Was It Constitutional? was done with https://essayfreelancewriters.comversion!

Pietrylo described these remarks as "just joking". Pietrylo also maintained that neither he nor any other "member of the group accessed the private group during work hours" and thus had the right to privacy. In 2009, a jury found that the company's managers had violated the SCA by intentionally accessing the MySpace page without authorization. The jury found in favor of the employer on the claim of invasion of privacy, stating that the plaintiffs had no reasonable expectation of privacy in the MySpace group. Given the results of this case, if you discover your employees talking about your company on MySpace, LinkedIn, Facebook or YouTube, exercise caution. Employees have the right to blow off steam on their own time. Unless your employees make statements that damage your interests or violate substantial company policies, you need to leave your employee's password-protected social media site alone. At the same time, you may find intriguing and useful information via social media. In two recent and real examples, employees working for two different employees asked for and received paid bereavement leave because a dear aunt passed away. There Are Plenty Of Means To Acquire Involved In Utah Politics learned that their employee actually enjoyed a long weekend hunting trip. The other employer learned through the employee's time-dated Facebook page that he'd enjoyed his vacation drinking beer in a tutu in a New York bar.

Their gateway to Heaven is to massacre in cold blood every single JonBenet Ramsey. Their goal is to burn down every Church, every Synagogue, every Buddhist Temple, every Hindu Temple and forcibly convert the world to Islam. If President Bush would just tell this to the American people then the Republican Party would not be drowning in false criticisms like: The war in Iraq is not part of the war on terror. Soldiers Deserve More Freedom Of Speech is not a war on terror. The Christian United States was viciously attacked on 911 by Islam, by 19 Saudi Arabian Muslims, 20 if you include Osama Bin Laden. The war is a war of self defense against Islam. Iraq is a Muslim country. Saddam Hussein was a brutal Muslim dictator giving $25,000 to the families of every Muslim Palestinian suicide bomber. He had and used chemical weapons of mass destruction on his own Kurdish people. Saddam built nuclear reactors but Israel bombed them. Why wont President Bush tell the truth that all Christians are in a world wide fight for their lives and the lives of their children against Islam? Ask him. Then ask yourselves why the Western media isnt trumpeting this truth from the headlines of every media outlet. Are they choking on their own sophistication and political correctness? Is it a hate crime to say that a religion of hate is a religion of hate coming to get you? The truth happens to be a complete defense in any slander and defamation action, and whatever happened to freedom of expression especially when you need the whole truth to save your life and the life of your children? How is Islam even legal now in the Western world? Havent the Christians and Jews read the Koran commanding their deaths and the deaths of their children and grandchildren? This post was written with Essay Freelance Writers!

The ruling party of the state has one interest in mind: to maintain its present regime and its ability to use coercive force on the majority. Those who aid the state, the privileged classes, are rewarded for their duty. If the state were to lose its privileged classes, if the people were to reject all programs of privilege, then the ruling class would lose its power and authority. The benefits that the rulers enjoy as the leaders of people would disintegrate. It is the nature of government to be corrupt, manipulative, and exploitive, the first enemy of the people. The French Revolution was a response to the endless reach of poverty due to the ruling class. The Cuban Revolution, the Russian Revolution, the Chinese Revolution, and many others were all started by citizens that were discontent with their government. If, in these cases, the government was wise enough to distribute more privilege instead of hording wealth, they might have survived. The nations of the world today have learned some lessons from history. They are willing to grant small concessions to the people, in order to maintain their power and oppress their citizens in other ways.