The Journaling of Hinton 389

America has always been a country which advocates freedom for its citizens- the freedom of speech, religion, even the freedom to decide if a marriage must end. Divorce rates have always been notoriously high in the Land of the Free, and many people wonder why. Is it something to do with our culture? Yes it indeed has a great connection with our culture. Our culture is a major contributor to any optimistic or pessimistic conduct of ours. We may heartedly go along with something or refrain from it on the basis of our cultural teachings. Culture is the non-physically (round the clock) present driving force that will define our social outcomes. In this connection the today's increased divorces rates can be one of the parameter that outlines our culture. There is a drastic increase in divorce rates in America in the recent years. This increased figure has altered the institution of marriage and family in ways not yet fully comprehended.

However, enough is understood to allow experts in the field to state that increased tolerance of divorce has produced insightful changes in our attitudes toward what we think marriage and family to be. It doesn't mean at all that marriages were perfect in the 18th and 19th century, however that toward the end of the 20th century, the traditional roles of men and women changed greatly with industrialization and urbanization and that has resulted in the disturbed family system. Dinesh D'Souza, a political writer, writes "Americans marry in a rather peculiar way: by falling in love." Indeed, many cultures do not see love as a very practical way of choosing a suitor. Instead they tend to rely on common sense, such as the family background of a person, their religion, reliability, political stance, and so on. In fact, in his (D'Souza) home land (India), if a person decides to wed a person who is obviously a poor choice, it is up to the neighborhood to gently guide the amorous couple in a very different direction.

When considering how poorly some marriages in our country fare, such actions on the half of the community seem very wise. Yet our culture would not stand for it, and label such actions as being "nosy". After all, our culture has a great stance on rights to privacy, so when it becomes well known that someone has an abusive husband or wife, no one in the neighborhood very willing to be the first to take matters into their own hands. After all, it is simply "none of our business". Now would it be right for us thinking that America's culture is promoting or encouraging divorce? And what could we contribute to prevent our nation from this plague. But maybe it is time it starts becoming our business. Judith Wallerstein, a psychologist and researcher who writes mainly on divorce, calls our attention to the fact that "first marriages stand a 45 percent chance of breaking up, and that second marriages have a 65 percent chance of ending in divorce". It is pitiful that such numbers are not seen in any other country. Would it be better for us to behave more like Indian society, where we allow ourselves to step into a situation, and do what we know is best for the couple at risk, or would we be betraying one of our most sacred rights as American citizens, which is the absolute privacy of our own lives?

Since those happy days we have entered into two lengthy conflicts, and our commitments have magnified to breaking point - and all without even reinstating the original budget of yesteryear. The increases we are being told of today, when seen in those real terms, become plainly pitiful! It seems neither Gordon Brown nor his predecessor, or anyone in the present government, has realised that the minute a country declares war or enters into a military conflict, if it really means business and wishes to avoid prolonging the action, it needs to write a blank cheque for its Armed Forces. When Essence Of Democracy And Freedom Of Speech; Disagreeing? and lasses are putting their lives on the line for us they must have EVERYTHING they need to do the job we ask of them as safely, as quickly, and as efficiently as is possible. To provide them with anything less is criminal, and to my mind today we have a government of criminals. The Debate On Public Prayer in both Afghanistan and Iraq have been plagued throughout by stories of a lack of equipment and resources. Data has been created with the help of Essay Writers.

What Freedom Means To Me: A Few Prompts For Your Essay have not gone away. Far from it, many have been substantiated by investigative journalism and television documentaries. I doubt I was alone in feeling ashamed of my country when at one point in the Iraq conflict it was revealed on a television documentary that it was only possible to have just one creaky, old Nimrod aircraft in operation as all the rest, having been cannibalised to keep that one airborne, were grounded. Talk about going to war on a shoestring! Our military lads and lasses have been performing miracles! But perhaps I shouldn't have said that, it might encourage the government to ask them to walk on water to get to the next conflict - and there goes our navy!

Religious freedom is being allowed to believe in anything you like, and not be victimized by the people around you. Prior to 1700, the British North American colonies had conflicting outlooks on the extent of religious freedom in the new world based on the different acts of the British Empire and by the English origin of most of the settlers. New England was mostly comprised of Puritans, the Middle Colonies consisted of Quakers, and the South was more concerned about using the land to make money and didn’t emphasize on religion. The Southern Mainland colonies considered the Church of England as their dominant faith although there was some religion freedom offered. North Carolina was the most open-minded in this region because of the fact that they were non-religious as well as resistant to authority and regarded as “poor” by Virginia standards. In Freedom Of Religion , this area was more concerned in acquiring slaves for producing tobacco and rice as exports and had a tough time establishing churches or schools since all the plantations were scattered and there were no cities in the area. The vicinity was also more ethnically mixed in places such as Virginia and therefore, made more accepting because of the different cultures and frankly, because they had nowhere to attend mass. This post was generated with the help of Essay Freelance Writersversion!

A probable reason should be established and explained to the individual prior to any search and seizure. Police officers are even required to present a documentation of the exact location of the search and the exact description of what they are looking for. The Fifth Amendment protects citizens against abuse of government authority in a legal procedure. This law secures procedural protections for criminal defendants and ensures that the government may not deprive a citizen of life, liberty, or property without due process of law. The Sixth Amendment protects the citizens' rights to a speedy and public trial, trial by a jury, and a right to counsel. This is an extension of the Fifth Amendment in terms of procedural protections. Primary Moments that a person remains innocent until proven guilty is what this is all about. The defendant of a criminal prosecution has the right to a speedy trial which is usually gauged through the absence of unreasonable delays. It also grants the right to be represented by an attorney of his choice or self representation if the defendant is competent enough. Lastly, the right to an unbiased jury is also ratified in this amendment.

Exception to jury right are petty crimes which requires only a short time of imprisonment. The Eighth Amendment protects citizens against federal government abuse in the form of excessive bail, excessive fines, cruel and unusual punishments. Bail refers to the process of depositing money in order to temporarily release someone from jail until trial proper. It is illegal to require the defendant to pay excessive bails and fines. Cruel and unusual punishments such as boiling to death, burning alive, stoning, disembowelment, and other forms of torture are prohibited by law. The execution of individuals who are under 18 and/or mentally disabled is also considered as violations of the Eighth Amendment. A lot of questions have continually emerged as to what extent the government can intervene in the ever changing issues that society has faced through out time. Although there is a remarkable improvement from the time of the Civil Rights Movement, issues concerning discrimination are still a work in progress. One thing's for sure, if people are deprived of their civil and political rights, history has it that social unrest may be inevitable.

The major Africa American protest was triggered on the first day of December 1955, when Rosa Parks (who was later called “The Mother of Freedom Movement” and “The First Lady of Civil Rights” by US Congress), African American activist from Alabama, refused to give up her seat in the ‘black section’ to the white passenger, for which she was immediately arrested and imposed with penalty. African Americans riding the same bus were not able to tolerate such over-the-top injustice and announced the campaign also known as Montgomery Bus Boycott. The few black car owners drove the protesters to work and back home, but most were forced to walk by foot. This boycott, which lasted for almost a year, united all the black community in a single strive for civil rights and equity. Despite the multiple threats from authorities and KKK racists, the Boycott participants adopted the ‘do-or-die’ position. Finally, the Supreme Court of United States passed a judgement prohibiting the public vehicle segregation.

Blogging can be a fun hobby for leisure, most people use blog as a platform to express themselves in many ways. The concept of blog was derived from journalism, where writing is involved to log special events that they experienced so they may honour their news piece. But almost anyone who can write today can use a blog. And because blog posts are usually presented as a personal view, it means issues can get personal with you. Nonetheless, blog is one of the most powerful tools for political propaganda. Where no personal views are accepted in other media, blog would be the place for the ultimate freedom of speech. With that, great power comes with great responsibility, definitely. But before you shout out loud for the freedom of speech, be sure to check where you are to know if your geography's culture and government is qualified for this belief. And whether you are writing for yourself or on behalf of an organization, there are some expected norms to comply if one intend to blog safely.

This generally consists of more things about what NOT to write about in blogs. If you are not in a country where freedom of speech is qualified, you might want to avoid writing anything related to politics or religion. These two topics are sensitive at nature and are best to be avoided at all times if you are unsure of the possible triggering effect. In some countries, you would not be sued when you draw the big F word on a wall expressing your view on political figure, because you have the freedom of speech, but on the other side of the world you could be jailed by just expressive your decent view. There have been many laws implemented on bloggers who are subjected to sedition, some governments are extra sensitive about the use of blog for these two topics because it is powerful and could lead to rebellion and terrorism.

You may not have the patriotism to criticize political matters, but you need not to be too self-absorb as the same time. Human Weaknesses And Strengths - Free Article Courtesy Of ArticleCity.com is, people simply have no time for your personal matters. If you want to whine about how bad the traffic was or how bad the food was you had for lunch, then you are better off writing this somewhere else and not in a public blog because people have more significant interests on other maters than yours. Unless you are a well-known celebrity, then people might want to know if you think Chinese cuisine is better or indian's. In some cases, it is a legitimate crime to copy-and-paste contents from other website without seeking their prior approval. There's nothing much to be said about using the contents of other without their permission but to let know that 'stealing' is simply not right. Aside from a possible lawsuit filled against you, your blog also do not benefit from search engine's improvements.

So make sure all contents are originally produced. If you are able to attract or provoke people to comment on your blog, then you must learn to manage these commentaries well. Not all comments favors your content, you may choose what is most appropriate of feedbacks that may be valuable for your clients. You may also encounter spams, and you should clean it whenever possible as people don't expect to see some viagra promotion to be on a religion blog. You should be able to make more sense with what is most relevant and beneficial to your blog and your readers. Nonetheless, Democrats Versus Republicans, The Battle Is Almost Over - Free Article Courtesy Of ArticleCity.com should also maintain a neutral attitude when responding to unfavorable comments to show some professionalism and objectivity. The world connects everyone closer to each other. Disclosing your identity,contact, lifestyle and habit give yourself more visibility and fame. But just like superstars, their fame sometimes attracts unwanted people and threatening situations in their lives. The same goes to you and your blog, the more information you disclose to the public, the more high profile you are and the higher chance of you inviting a stalker in your life. As long as your blog is available publicly, you'll never know who could be reading it. So avoid posting topics that include a specific incidents and dropping names. Being Those Who Thought That Would Be in writing means being safe. It shows professionalism and objectivity. So try not to use too many adjectives in your writing, avoid using 1st person words and maintain a 3rd person view whenever possible. This gives better credibility and acceptance for your contents. Remember, your blog is the work of yourself and it can be used as a legal documentation should any problems arise. Despite that post only topics that you are really serious about or no reader will take your blog seriously, if you still have a reader. This article was created by Essay Writers!

Most moms are and thats why they wing it. There are groups that will promote a particular type of feeding based on a political agenda (did you know that how you feed your baby is a politically-correct hot button?) and philosophy. There are others who will condemn you for even considering feeding your child formula, regardless of your reasons. Im not going to condemn anyone here or even talk about what to feed your baby. I just want to make you aware of your options and suggest that parent-directed feeding (PDF) is good for babies, mommies, and families in general. How you decide to feed your baby will have a profound effect on your childs hunger patterns, sleep patterns, and general disposition. When I talk about PDF, Im not talking about letting the clock rule when you feed your baby, but using a flexible schedule. This generally serves both baby & mother and takes much of the guess-work involved in feeding and parenting out of the equation. Its my experience that both mommy & baby do better when the babys life is guided by this flexible schedule. Data was generated with the help of Essay Writers.

PDF is a middle-ground between hyper-scheduling (letting the clock rule your feeding routines) and demand-feeding (every time your baby cries, you feed him). This method is child-oriented (not child-centered or mother-centered); the mother cooperates with her babys needs, and her baby learns to cooperate with his mothers guidance. Much of parent-directed feeding requires some common sense and a commitment to not be ruled by the clock and The Rules. No one who practices PDF will tell you that you should not feed your baby if he is hungry; your role as a mommy is to meet his needs, and that includes adequate nutrition. Additionally, no one who uses this method will tell you that you must let your baby wait if hes hungry—thats being a slave to the clock, and not being responsive to your babys needs. Instead, you will meet your childs needs without being enslaved to them or someone elses ideas of how you should feed your baby. Thats the freedom that PDF can bring to your life and the life of your baby! Kirsten Hawkins is a baby and parenting expert specializing new mothers and single parent issues.

A black person with Kenyan heritage for a president. Why We Must Resist Trump's Challenges To Our Freedoms: 5 Examples having a female for president by a whisker. A business tycoon with no history in politics for a president. These three scenarios show a continent that’s open to political diversity, where else on earth can those scenarios play out? Almost every essay about freedom never misses mentioning politics and democracy, because they are the backbone of society. Any society that doesn’t respect this has problems with coexistence. Its respect of these two factors can describe freedom in America. You can speak your mind without fear of being reprimanded as long as it doesn’t infringe on the right of others. Defamation Lawsuits And The Insurance Claims That Follow what liberty in America looks like. Journalists are not denied the chance to report the news as it is. The opportunity to speak your thoughts and mind is just freedom of expression. A freedom essay, regardless of its focus, always mentions speech.

Did you know that there are actual places on earth where women cannot speak in a gathering where men are? It is unbelievable and a backward way of living in this century. The fact that you can get up each morning and speak as you wish, on social media, through music or poetry, among others, must be appreciated. There are places where the government regulates access to media platforms such as Facebook. All that America asks of you is that you don’t misuse this freedom by causing harm to others or yourself. Religion is more of a hot topic and one that I would not want to go into deeply. There have been so many deaths for centuries because of it. I say both because this is a personal choice and whatever you believe to be right is. America, despite suffering much from the war on religion, has been open to letting all practice the faith that they desire.

This is among the top defining features of how American freedom looks like. You can worship in your way. Sadly, it is the opposite of specific regions. Many have been executed because of holding different religious beliefs. Even immigrants in this nation are not denied a chance to worship as they please, unlike some countries where practicing a religion different from theirs is a cause for arrest or even execution. An essay on freedom always has a way of letting us see how flawed we are as human beings. Why would we want to force our faith onto someone else when it is a personal decision? Regardless of our religious beliefs, we should coexist with each other. The liberty to realize your dreams only happens in America. There is a saying that dreams only come true in America. Well, the system of society is such that it is open to one and all, and what they have to offer. If you’re good at something, don’t shy away from it because, in this great land, you can be whomever and whatever you aspire to be. There are countless opportunities available for your dreams to be realized, and you have the freedom to cease these opportunities. This freedom in America essay example highlights to us what freedom in America is and what is special about it. The truth is that the American society is so advanced that people have the freedom to hold a different political, religious and social belief without any repercussions so long as it doesn’t negatively affect others. The liberty expressed in America is an inspiration to most societies today. This is why American freedom deserves the attention it gets. It is an anchor for communities across the globe.

Oftentimes, the Court is confronted with the issue: Which right demands greater protection, the right to privacy or the freedom of expression or of the press? The so called balancing-of-interest doctrine gives the court the prerogative which right demands greater protection. This doctrine requires a court to take conscious consideration of the interplay of interest observable in a given situation. When expression touches upon matters of private concern, privacy right is paramount than freedom of expression. There are other rules or limitations upon the freedom of expression, it must however, be stressed that the Court in the exercise of its power of judicial review is not precluded from applying the appropriate rule in a given case. In short, a case will have to be decided with openness. On which rule to apply is a matter of judicial discretion. The protection of fundamental liberties is the essence of constitutional democracy. The rights enumerated in the Bill of Rights are primarily directed against the abuses of the government in the exercise of its massive powers.

When the court ruled proscription against unlawful searches and seizures, it is directed only against the government and its agencies that are tasked with the enforcement of the laws and not against private persons. Directly interlaced with the right of the people against unreasonable searches and seizures is the right of communication and correspondence. This provision of the Constitution strengthens the privacy of men which must remain inviolable. The freedom of correspondence extends to convey one's views and sentiments. A court cannot order a lawyer to disclose or divulge matters belonging to his client which is a breach of the confidentiality of lawyer-client relationship. In the same way, a medical practitioner cannot impart to anybody the health record of a person without his permission. If so judicially decreed however, the privilege of communication and correspondence may be violated. The right of the people to be let alone can also be invoked by the government. The President can invoke executive privilege in keeping his officials from testifying at legislative inquiry or the court, even if subpoenaed. The Judiciary in protecting its interest and in maintaining public order may ban press people inside a courtroom. Content has been created by Essay Writers.

Court proceedings before a camera may provoke passion and violence thus, risk the security of the justices and the court personnel. However, critics of the camera ban advocate that the public has the right to access to information; that, the right to privacy of the justices should not come before the interest of the whole nation. The right to free speech and the press is the body and soul of man without which his existence becomes empty and meaningless. Like the right to life, the right to judge public matters and concerns is important to guard to the uttermost the right to free speech and the press. The people therefore, have a duty to maintain such right, either verbally or through publication their guileless condemnations of the acts of government. If the State through fear and threats could silence the voices of the people regarding the conduct of the government, the people might as well say goodbye to the rule of law and democracy. Freedom of the press and expression will be rendered useless unless the media are given free access to information on matters of public concern.

This is their duty to the public and the people. Access to official records, papers and documents concerning government transactions and decisions and their accountabilities shall not be denied to citizens subject to limitations as may be provided by law. The Constitution mandates that access to public information must not be denied a person. While freedom of expression is sacred, it is however, neither a license nor is it illimitable. The Constitutional provisions on freedom of speech and of the press do not permit the publications and utterances of libelous, indecent articles or other publications injurious to public morals or private reputation. Media is not allowed to make public personal matters about a person without his consent. A person's private reputation is as much entitled to the protection of the law as to express one's thought freely. Likewise, the existence of government is entitled to protection against seditious attacks. There is right to publish the truth but the right to publish falsehood to the injury of others cannot be allowed. Truth however, does not justify publication of morally reprehensible items inconsistent to public order and concern.

2. No Tenure / No Pension. A Congressman collects a salary while in office and receives no pay when they are out of office. 3. Congress (past, present and future) participates in Social Security. All funds in the Congressional retirement fund move to the Social Security system immediately. All future funds flow into the Social Security system, and Congress participates with the American people. 4. Congress can purchase their own retirement plan, just as all Americans do. Most Americans no longer have any chance of receiving a traditional pension. Politicians, whose pensions are paid by the very people who no longer can get a pension, should not be entitled to something most Americans can not receive. 5. Congress will no longer vote themselves a pay raise. Congressional pay will rise by the lower of CPI or 3% but only if the voters agree that they are doing a good job. This approach requires that the political class actually be successful in their job before getting rewarded, much like the plight of most working Americans.

Free will takes to the joust of disbelief, as many forsake the essence of one's capacity for the freedom of choice. In lieu of liberation, most prefer enslavement to an ideology of deterministic oppression. Others, a valiant few, will fight on and resist the simplistic complacency of safe mediocrity in status quo consensus. Instead of the influence of logic, creativity and transformation, all often feelings devolve to selfish arrogance of antisocial contrivances. Maladaptive and regressive, pitiful excuses for the stupidity, shape modern narratives from one alibi to the next. Frequently, responsibility hides with accountability the darkness of human motivations. While integrity searches for the lost horizons of credence, common sense takes exile. Human systems, influenced by over-lapping human interactions, devolve to the consumptive pursuit of consumer gluttony. By neither dogma of original sinfulness, division of the fall, nor misbegotten hindsight of original righteousness, motivational factors are matters of rational selectivity. A cause is set into motion by willful and well-chosen targeting of specificity. With malice aforethought, premeditation and intentional purposes, instigation are set to motion. Yet, the complexity of human thinking dares the intricacy of psychological magic for purposeful instigation. Data has been generated with https://essayfreelancewriters.com!

Personal Core Values - Free Article Courtesy Of ArticleCity.com for a linkage of personal freedom in a credo of self-reliance potentially relates to the nature of human consciousness. Complexity is too simplistic to define the wholeness or totality of such manifestations. Not to forget of course, the necessity for personal proclivity in creativity, the innovative criticality of self-transformation. Many will not change. What Does It Mean To Be An American Essay, With Outline - Gudwriter.com will satisfy most satisfied with the less than creative banality of life. Devoted attentiveness to self-evolution, beyond the stagnant fixated selfishness, remains a daunting mission for most people. Except for the few who will risk dangerous and treacherous trek of differentiation, many will stay behind. The more one asserts his or her freedom of choice, contrary to the concession of normalcy, the greater to the observation of how little others change. Deviation is a rational process of selectivity in spite of what contemporary neuro-gurus claim. For a number of fearful reactions, emotional sensitivity in perverse self-righteous subjective validation, particularly in the "hallowed" halls of academia, proclaim deterministic exclusivity.

By dogmatic determination, many from the realms of pseudoscience in "social studies" defame the liberation of the human mindset. For them, free will is an illusion. Regardless, the valiant ones press on in the persistence of individuality to foster higher forces of personal freedom. While evil grins, death leers and the pompous piety of those who smirk in their conceit. Evil is a metaphor to express the damage done to others for the satiation of egoistic proclamations. Evil encompasses the notion of malevolence, horrors, tortures, crimes, oppressions and so on, that humans do to each other for the sake of self-enrichment. Such is the narcissistic infantilism of the post-modern era in which one condemns others who disagrees regardless of evidence. Back and forth, the ebb and flow, and the eventual demise of the human species for the sake of selfish aggrandizement. For 2020 - Memorable And Forgettable Political Quotes From Our Politcians of intentional malevolence, with careless disregard for an evolving process, animosity and condescension inflicts tortuous consequences for illicit purposes.

Sometimes, these perpetrations are by pretext of intellectual subset to the nasty invective toward another who might take issue with the former. As such, bullying comes in many forms. Within the cerebral context of constant chemical actions, in complex organic functions, one can only guess as to the actuality of inner cause and effect. Regardless, freedom is essential and pervades the insistence for willing effort to think in rational terms. Absent reliable scientific validation beyond any doubt, by weight and proof of evidence, everything else is a matter of opinion. Although thinking errors are easy, logical efforts are challenging. Scared, overly sensitive and self-victimized by perceptions of a false reality, mindset dulled and expression muted by magical thinking, stupidity finds excuses. To assert a possession of free will threatens the ideological dogma reinforced in status quo shallowness. One size fits all, the template in the same, a standardized production of consuming robotics in human form.

Normal Rockwell prints are a great example of American art from the 20th century. Rockwell was a key artist from this time as his prints remain very popular with the art public in the modern day. This article brings his best prints to your attention and also examines his life and career in detail. Rockwell began as a magazine illustrator before achieving fame as a skilled oil painter. Later in his career he also used his skills to tackle key social issues of that period after his confidence as an artist had grown considerably. By the end of his career, Norman Rockwell had helped set up a museum to house the best of his works close to his American home. It remains today and houses the largest collection of Norman Rockwell works, including prints, posters, covers, images, pictures and more. Rockwell's original works are also frequently reproduced for fans as stretched canvases, giclee art prints and unframed posters. Post was created with the help of Essay Writers!

When Ned gets to work, his emails and phone calls are being monitored not only by his boss, but by various federal agencies that have been authorized by the government to spy on him, since Americans are now considered to be guilty of anti-social or anti-government acts, and must prove that they are not guilty, if the government demands it. The presumption of innocence, which is one of the foundations of our freedom, is gone. Ned is very careful of what he says in his phone calls and his emails, knowing they are being heard and read by people looking to catch him in an illegal act. Ned, by the way, is so law-abiding that he hasnt ever torn off the labels attached to his mattresses that threatens him with the phrase, “It is unlawful to remove this lab! ” much less thinking about blowing up a plane, but in America 2010, he is guilty until proven innocent. Yes, it is necessary to protect ourselves. No, monitoring billions of communications a day is not the way to do it. Every day, in some part of America, laws are being passed by governments that continue to erode the freedoms that make a mockery of the constitutional guarantee of each of us having been born with the inalienable right to Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness. Despite his campaign promise to restore our civil rights as citizens of America, and to make government smaller, President Obama has accelerated the growth of his government, and given his stamp of approval to unconstitutional laws that make us less free. So much for “change.” Its been business as usual.

Other notable figures are: Susan B. Anthony , Zechariah Chafee Jr. , and Alexander Meiklejohn . At a time when a woman's voice did not carry far, Susan B. Anthony was determined to speak publicly and freely. Chafee was a strong twentieth-century proponent of free speech, and likened the First Amendment "to a barricade behind which journalists, authors, and speakers had a chance to pursue and present the truth" (Stevens 1982). Lastly, Meiklejohn is another influential twentieth-century figure who has written extensively on the topic of free speech. American Civil Liberties Union: Founded in 1920 as a nonprofit and nonpartisan organization, the ACLU is designed to defend American citizens' civil liberties. Basically, it is the ACLU's contention that despite an individual's race, sexual orientation, religious beliefs, or disabilities, every person in the United States should possess the same basic rights. Amnesty International: A worldwide organization that campaigns for human rights for all people. National Association for the Advancement of Colored People: An organization created to abolish segregation and discrimination and to create equal opportunities for quality housing, employment, education, voting and constitutional rights. American Civil Liberties Union. Clotfelter, Charles T. and Thomas Ehrlich. Philanthropy and the Nonprofit Sector in a Changing America. Hammack, David C. Making the Nonprofit Sector in the United States. Meiklejohn, Alexander. Political Freedom: the Constitutional Powers of the People. National Archives and Records Administration. Stevens, John D. Shaping the First Amendment. Tedford, Thomas L. Freedom of Speech in the United States.

The headline looked common enough: School Sued Over MySpace Photo Response. Apparently a woman was denied a teaching degree on the eve of graduation because she published her picture captioned "Drunken Pirate" on her MySpace. The photo, apparently taken at a 2005 Halloween party, showed Stacy Snyder wearing a pirate hat while drinking from a plastic "Mr. Goodbar" cup. Jane Bray, dean of the School of Education at Millersville University in Millersville, Pennsylvania, took exception to Snyder's photo, accusing Snyder of promoting underage drinking. Although Snyder apologized, she learned the day before graduation that she would not be awarded an education degree or teaching certificate. Snyder was instead granted a degree in English last year. Snyder, who is now 27 and reportedly works as a nanny, has sued Millersville University, seeking $75,000 in damages. All of this raises some interesting questions about how this legal action will play out in court if it gets that far.

As students in the United States, many of the kids you work with have probably thought about the idea of religious freedom. After all, as a value, it underpins the earliest history of our country, and it comes up over the course of US history time and time again. Yet The Life Of A Child - Free Article Courtesy Of ArticleCity.com of religion is not always simple to define, and it certainly does not mean the same thing to everybody. One way to help your students think about the significance of religious freedom is to have them write essays about it. The essay topics in this lesson are oriented toward encouraging deep and critical thinking about religious freedom. Offer one example from history of a fight for religious freedom. In your essay, describe how and why the people you are writing about felt oppressed, who was oppressing them and why, and how they struggled for freedom. Analyze both the methods and the outcome of their struggle, then offer your view of the implications of this particular struggle for religious freedom overall.

What was Thou Shalt Emasculate of religious freedom in the founding of the United States? To what extent do you see religious freedom as one of the core values of our country, and to what extent do you see it as irrelevant? Use different examples from history to show how religious freedom has been important over the course of the development of the United States. Zero in on two different struggles for religious freedom in either different geographical or cultural milieus or different time periods. Compare and contrast the two struggles. Write about what you think might make all struggles for religious freedom essentially similar but also consider why it might be important to note their differences. Using examples from history, describe whether or not you think violence can be justified in a struggle for religious freedom. Think about why some people have resorted to violence and others have not, and consider the overall implications this has had for the outcomes of struggles for religious freedom. What is one time in history that you think the people of a particular religion have enjoyed true freedom and simultaneously allowed members of other religions to enjoy true freedom in the same geographic area? Describe what Does The News Media Have A Moral Responsibility? believe it takes to have this kind of freedom, and speculate as to why situations like this have been historically rare or hard to come by.

On these matters, I tend to agree with Ron Paul and would vote them same way he did. Where I differ on Ron Paul is on the "anchor baby" issue and birthright citizenship. I favor the American tradition of jus soli (law of ground) tradition over jus sanguinis (right of blood) since I am a staunch individualist and I don't believe that one's bloodlines, race, or language should be used for OR against anyone and that people are by their nature, born good. All persons born in the allegiance of the King are natural-born subjects, and all persons born in the allegiance of the United States are natural-born citizens. Birth and allegiance go together. Such is the rule of the common law, and it is the common law of this country, as well as of England. We find no warrant for the opinion that this great principle of the common law has ever been changed in the United States.

This is the approach of simple men like Captain Best, who managed to hold his own for the duration of the war in various concentration-camps, and it is shared by trained psychiatrists like Elie Cohen, the Dutch author of Human Behavior in the Concentration Camp, who managed to survive Auschwitz, although his wife and children were murdered there. There is still no organized lobby in Washington to represent adequately the interests of buyers of goods and services. The drug industry has the Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Association with lobbyists registered with Congress. The individual druggists are banded together in the American Pharmaceutical Association. Physicians have the American Medical Association to promote their often antediluvian interests. But who represents the man who takes his doctor's prescription to the pharmacist to have it filled with drugs manufactured by Upjohn? No one. He passively pays what is charged for what he is given. The consumer has no leverage, because for the most part he is unorganized, unrepresented and therefore helpless. Official regulatory agencies have had an interesting place in consumer protection -- seeming to serve the public interest in safe air travel, wholesome food, safe and effective drugs, honest advertising and packaging, fairness in broadcasting over public airwaves, and so on while at the same time placating American business and keeping the airlines, the pharmaceutical houses, the TV networks and stations, and commerce generally in the black. Even in the eight years of Kennedy Johnson, the regulators often seemed to serve the special interests they are in business to oversee rather than those of the consumer they exist to protect. The best indirect evidence of this is the careers of the regulators, who serve a short hitch in the public service and then take fat jobs in the private sector, usually with companies they have regulated.

Many Americans have a point of view that freedom of speech in Europe is similar to that in the United States but that is not the case. Germany, for example, has multiple laws regulating freedoms, including freedom of expression, that have their roots based in the post World War II era. Hate speech in Europe is generally not viewed as a critical freedom. Hate speech is often regulated in the interest of “harmony”. As terrorism becomes more common on the continent, more policies are being enacted throughout the Europe to limit freedom of speech and expression. Many believe that free speech rights extend to the internet but that is not necessarily true. Companies like Google have their own right to set guidelines for posting content on their websites. This is interesting in that today, major websites like Google, YouTube, Twitter, and Facebook have more control over your speech through their policies than the U.S. Government. These large corporations generally attempt to operate under the rules and guidelines in the countries they serve but that isn’t always the case. Many have at least have some form of “hate speech” which restrict what may be posted by users. This data has been done by Essay Writersversion.

Bumper stickers are a fantastic way to promote your business, brag on your band, provoke thought, share some humor and express religious views. You can get a lot of attention with these little powerhouses; the power of the bumper sticker has been underestimated to many people's chagrin. This simple, inexpensive method of free speech is one of the most powerful tools you have to share your ideas and opinions. They can also be dangerous, apparently. Road rage is an unpleasant phenomenon, to say the least. Getting the finger or having a horn blown at you are just the tip of the iceberg as far as bumper sticker engendered road rage goes. One Florida woman learned this to her dismay. Bullying, Personal Attacks And Hate Speech Comes Alive In The Digital Age along the highway, she was startled by a blowing horn beside her. Looking over, she saw a stranger; a man and he were waving a small sign at her that said "Don't Forget that Bush's Illegal War Killed Thousands in Iraq." Suddenly, it clicked. Michelle Fernandez realized that he was reacting to her Bush/Cheney sticker on the back of her SUV. Before True Or False? could go much further with her realization, though, the man tried to run her off the road.

Swerving to a stop, she saw the man get out of his car and come running towards her own vehicle, where her 10 year old son and 3 year old daughter were. Understandably, Ms. Fernandez decided to leave and find the closest police officer. Less than an hour after she made her report, the officers had arrested the man at his home. His father described him as very anti-Bush, but a calm and reasonable person. Obviously, Ms. Fernandez has her doubts about his reasonableness. Bumper stickers, while being a great way to get attention, can also get you the wrong kind of attention, apparently. Freedom of speech is your right, but angry people don't stop to consider things like that. It's amazing how a simple political bumper sticker can engender such overwhelming road rage. In news that may even increase the amount of bumper sticker related road rage, Volkswagen has released a statement saying that they are close to completing a product that will allow you to create your own bumper sticker, complete with custom sayings. You'll be able to display custom messages and images through VW's electrophoretic display.

Article has been generated with the help of https://essayfreelancewriters.comversion.

This device will let you change your message and pictures as you want; whether you're in a good mood, a bad mood, angry, sad or just feeling punchy. VW envisions this product as a popular add on for vehicles that will foster a sense of community by letting drivers communicate their feelings more accurately. Sounds like a recipe for disaster, doesn't it? Can you imagine the road rage engendering statements and pictures that will parade across the face of this device? And you thought bumper stickers were bad! While VW may be convinced that this will be a beneficial device, there are millions of drivers who may disagree with that sentiment. Road rage aside, bumper stickers remains an incredibly popular method to make your point. You get an incredible amount of notice with these little devices, whether you're advertising for your local school, lauding your child's performance in class or telling the world to take a hike.

Custom bumper stickers can be created just for your cause, event or anything else you can think of, using your logos, graphics, text and images or you can get them custom created for you. Printing bumper stickers is a very cost effective means of advertising and promotion. No matter what you want to say, these are one of the best ways to go about it. Bumper sticker inspired road rage is still rare, or rarely reported, depending on whom you talk to. The fact that bumper stickers elicit a reaction, even an angry one, is a testimony to the power they hold. Many bumper stickers are designed to anger other drivers, though most are created to make someone laugh or raise an eyebrow in questioning someone's sanity. We've all found bumper stickers that we found offensive or downright annoying and yet most of us haven't tried to run anyone off the road for expressing their freedom of speech.

Right now, the politicians in this country control a large part of our retirement financials via Social Security, they control our retirement health care via Medicare, they control our personal wealth and income via dozens and dozens of government taxes and fees, they control the education of our kids via public schooling, they control a larger portion of our pre-retirement medical care via Obama Care, they control who we eventually get to vote for (via gerrymandering of Congressional districts, controlling of campaign financing sources, using taxpayer money to fund earmarks which are just campaign finance tools, etc.), they control and criminalize what substances we put into our bodies, they belittle us for daring to have a difference of opinion, and they control who gets certain rights based on sexual orientation. They use these forms of control to drain us of our individuality in order to make us more controllable and reliant on their needs and desires. Data was generated with Essay Writers.

The United States of America is precisely 239 years old. While it is one of the youngest countries in the world, America is often thought of as big brother and a defender of humankind. America is also often derided by other nations and seen as arrogant and possessive. Regardless of what other countries think, Americans think of themselves on a wide spectrum that goes from lavish jingoism to harsh criticism. Whatever the opinion may be, one thing that America seems to be is freedom. America is freedom in all of its glory and ignominy. America is freedom of religion. This country was founded on the principal that anyone may come and practice the religion of their people. Freedom of religion is the First Amendment in the Constitution. Our founding fathers “made no reference whatever to God or divine providence, citing as its sole authority ‘the people of the United States’” (Lambert). This should have ensured the people of this country the right to worship whichever god they choose or no god at all. The true separation of church and state that was originally imposed by the Constitution was inspirational to countries around the world. But there are Workplace Complaints And Venting Through Social Media to this seemingly all-inclusive rule. Why does Free Essays On America - Land Of Opportunity? of Allegiance contain the phrase “one nation under God”? While it is not a requirement to say The Pledge of Allegiance due to freedom of speech, it is disrespectful in some people’s opinions not to do so. This data has been generated with https://essayfreelancewriters.com!

Belarus: This is another country that does not offer Freedom of Speech and Expression. People cannot voice their opinions or criticize the work of the government. Criticism of the government or any political minister is a criminal offense here. Iran: The citizens of Iran are not aware of what it is like to express their opinion and share their ideas freely in the public. Nobody can express any kind of discontentment against public laws or Islamic standards. Burma: The government of Burma is of the opinion that the Freedom of Speech and Expression is unnecessary. The citizens are asked not to express their ideas or opinions particularly if they are against any leader or political party. The media in this country is run by the government. Libya: Most people in this country do not even know as to what Freedom of Speech and Expression really is. The government of Libya is known for oppressing its citizens. In Customer Service Is Dead In Britain! of the internet, people around the world are free to express their views on any matter but not in this country. Many people in the country have been arrested for criticizing the government on the internet. Freedom of Speech and Expression is a basic human right that must be given to the citizens of each country. It is sad to see the way the governments of certain countries do not provide even this essential human right to its citizens and oppresses them to fulfill their own selfish motives. This article has been created by Essay Writers!

In the context of the 18th century, the right to own and use guns at will was a bit of a no-brainer. In the context of the 21st century, the freedom to purchase, own, and operate guns is often an intense debate on individual to national levels. Therefore, the idea of freedom changes over time as the context of the country changes, which means as the culture changes. The culture changes as a result of the loss or gaining of additional freedoms of certain groups. Consider how the country changed when segregation became illegal. Consider how the country changed when alcohol was illegal. Further consider how the country changed when a great deal of minority groups gained additional rights as a result of the Civil Rights Movement/Era of the 1960s. Think to the turn of the 20th century, at the climax of industrialization, when laborers, women, and children gained additional rights in the workplace with respect to wages, safety, and the work week. All of the struggles for rights mentioned altered the course of American history in major ways in every case. The American idea is no longer bound to a specific place on a map.

It exists in many forms all over the world. There is still some distance to be traveled until all members of society experience the fruits of liberty. But one thing is for certain: American freedom grows, never shrinks. It expands rather than contracts. 2: XND Magazine. 2012. American Freedom -- the idea. The idea of freedom has changed over the course of American history, but at the same time, there are elements of the idea of American freedom that have remained the same. One the one hand, the kinds of groups and the specific freedoms that they fight for, do change over time. Women may want some kind of rights at one point in history, and another set of rights in another. Native Americans may have not fought for rights in a longer time, but then in other parts of history they fight a great deal. Where as in other points in history, middle class Americans did not have so much to fight for, but in the 21st century, they fight for rights of protection against big private business and a too lenient federal government. The changing context and actual changes in American culture (such as the changing population of the course of American history) contribute directly to the kinds of struggles and the kind of freedoms struggled for. What does not change about the idea of freedom in America is that no matter the group, and no matter the right, Americans fight for the freedom to choose and for the freedom to access.